Generally speaking, when rural education is "seen", the viewpoints of discussion will focus on two ends:
Education: How to convince poor families to give up their current income to invest in medium and long-term education to make them believe that their education investment will pay off exponentially
Education side: how to better "help" rural education to turn up instead of short-term sports-style charity, such as solving the problem of the quantity and quality of teachers, solving the nutritional problem of students, and solving the problem of backward teaching environment
Investment in basic education is an extremely effective means of enhancing human capital. Years of education (undergraduate and below) will significantly affect the average income of the group
But it's hard to do your homework with research results or statistics because then you have to assume that both parents are well educated to understand them
For them, the meaning of real life is more moving
For these students who can't get enough to eat and don't warm up and don't have fifty cents in their pockets and their families who may be in debt
What is the point of going to school? How much money is needed to achieve your goals? How much work does it take to get the money? How much time does it take? Being able to read and understand notice boards? Being able to write a missing person notice?
The process of bringing students back to students is actually a process of teaching in real life, and it is a process of proving the value of education that cannot be revived (the movie shows it, but it is not dogmatic or preaching)
In addition to the students who drop out of school, on the other hand, the problem faced by rural schools is what teachers are treated poorly and the number of schools is broken.
How did a little girl who graduated from primary school become a rural substitute teacher? for 50 bucks
But in fact, there is still a very simple value in it.
The study committee felt distressed by the white chalk that was smashed by the stinky child and said that it was Teacher Gao's most cherished and reluctant episode. After this episode came out, it was obvious that Teacher Wei had ownership of this teacher's identity.
Because she really cares about Teacher Gao when she sees that there are children around her (the movie shows it, but it is not sensational or pretentious)
A little teacher who doesn't have much ability and can't even control the monkeys, still has her determination and bravery, not to mention the hard work of insisting on taking the child back, I don't think I can do it. Sometimes it's just you Seems to know more but can't implement even a simple truth
In the end, the child found the host on the way back home in the TV station car and asked where the city was good.
The skin monkey said to eat for free
Then said the most memorable thing is to beg
These three or two dialogues are really well designed.
Taking advantage but hurting self-esteem
View more about Not One Less reviews
