Every time I look at similar "logically rigorous" reasoning, I always feel that there is still a problem with logic.
Although I also gave this movie 5 stars, I still think there is a bug in it.
1. So lack of monitoring?
The story happened in 2014. There are two pieces of evidence about the year.
At this point, the police's detection technology can already record the location of the mobile phone according to the SIM card (provided that the mobile phone is turned on), and it can even find that the mobile phone in the service area on October 2 is not the same as the mobile phone on October 3 Model of mobile phone.
By 2014, the police technology is already very powerful. However, in Panaji, there are no surveillance cameras on the roads, hotels, restaurants, movie theaters, etc., except for AMT? We must know that Panaji's economic level is very high in India, and the per capita GDP should be more than 2 times higher than the average level of India.
2. On the evening of October 2nd, there was a record of outgoing (not connected) fixed-line telephone in Vijay's home, and it was called to Vijay's office.
By calling up the phone records through the telephone company, you can know that there was a call from Vijay's home to Vijay's office on the evening of October 2nd.
If your family is listening to the lecture in Panaji on the 2nd, who made this call? Why did TA call Vijay's office?
3. Why not use handwriting for judicial identification [the biggest loophole]?
The record registered on October 2 is a handwriting imitated by Vijay. Now that the forensic expertise is so mature, take the original registration copy for judicial identification to see if it is the handwriting of the lobby manager or the handwriting of Vijay.
Vijay took out a large number of bills on October 3, and these are real bills. But the most critical point in this case is October 2nd, where are they !
But the only documentary evidence that can prove October 2nd is this housing registration. The inspector general has speculated that Vijay had forged the handwriting .
When I was studying in 2003, my roommate was a law major, and he often told me that signature handwriting can be used for judicial authentication, and the authentication technology is already very mature.
Why doesn't the inspector general use the signature handwriting for appraisal? Once identified, the evidence of your alibi on October 2 will be completely deciphered. Vijay is not a calligrapher, let alone an expert in handwriting imitation. He is just an ordinary small boss, and he has not specifically studied the handwriting of the customer service . It is only a temporary imitation on the spot, and the judicial system can't help him? It is really too easy to forge evidence in this world!
[Supplement] The earliest case of Chinese handwriting identification can be traced back to the Three Kingdoms period. Someone wrote an anonymous letter to slander Cao Cao. The suspect was found by a person named Guoyuan through the method of note identification and was successfully cracked. You have to say that after 2000, India has not yet mastered the handwriting identification technology (the key is to identify the handwriting i temporarily imitated by Vijay, which absolutely does not need the support of high-tech equipment), I will not believe it.
4. If you have the habit of keeping invoices, please bring out the invoices and account statements from 10 months ago.
Vijay said they have the habit of keeping invoices in order to check the bills and find out unnecessary expenses.
Okay, please take out the invoice and bill before October.
If you really have the bills ready, check the authenticity of the bills one by one. There seems to be a lot of hope to prove that Vijay’s invoices were specially prepared, rather than being used to keep the invoices.
5. When the principal called An Jiu’s mother, did he inform the investigation on October 2?
When Natini panicked, there was no silver three hundred taels and said, "We are not at home on the 2nd". Then Vijay lied and said that the principal called and told her, "The date is also said."
Then ask the principal, what he said on the phone.
Maybe the principal really said it, maybe he didn't.
If the principal really said it, then this round lie is perfect; but what if the principal did not say it? Isn't this lie broken?
6. Why not visit nearby residents and ask if there are any witnesses who saw Vijay's family on October 2nd?
You know, on October 2nd, their family was indeed in Poduling!
Doesn't anyone in the surrounding residents remember seeing one of their family members in Podulin on October 2nd? Moreover, during the day on October 2, An Jiu went to the supermarket to buy something, and Vijay went to work at the company.
Of course I know that the hotel owner and other key witnesses have been successfully "brainwashed" by Vijay, but Vijay can never successfully brainwash all the surrounding residents .
October 2 is a special day in India. Even if many people can't remember, don't they remember any of them? For example, who happened to plan to go out on Gandhi anniversary, and then met An Jiu shopping in the supermarket; or who happened to install broadband on October 2 and went to Vijay’s office to see Vijay; or who’s on October 2 I planned to go to a restaurant to celebrate Gandhi’s anniversary. I happened to see Vijay eating at the restaurant and even chatted with each other. Or who happened to be their wedding anniversary on October 2 and they happened to meet Vijay when they went out to celebrate. family……
Throughout the show, the inspector general is reviewing Vijay’s carefully crafted evidence, instead of taking the initiative to visit nearby residents to investigate and collect evidence . This is completely inconsistent with the common sense of the police in handling cases.
Ordinarily, the inspector general is a very talented policeman. She is keenly aware that Vijay is lying, and she can even figure out how all of Vijay's actions are made-her guess is 100% correct, and obviously IQ is very good. High and rich experience in handling cases. However, she didn't even try the above five clues 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 .
In fact, I think that black is black and must not be proved to be white. Yan Guo left a trace, and as long as the chief inspector had a sufficiently high IQ, he would definitely be able to find the flaws in it. However, throughout the show, the wise inspector general has always turned a blind eye to the flaws. Obviously, it was requested by the director, and the traces of deliberate arrangements are somewhat obvious.
On the one hand, the director must show that the chief prosecutor is insightful in handling the case, and on the other hand, he must show that Vijay's work is not leaking. Only in this way will there be a master's tricks and won the audience's applause. However, this is a high IQ duel. The design of this duel requires the screenwriter and director to have higher IQ requirements. Unfortunately, the screenwriter and director have insufficient IQ standards, so they can only cut their feet to fit their feet and artificially weaken the chief inspector’s "effectiveness". "IQ" only retained her "invalid IQ", so the strange phenomenon that the chief prosecutor judged correctly but couldn't do anything.
7. This by the way
The story took place in 2014. According to the setting of the story, Saturday, October and February 2014, is the anniversary of Gandhi’s birthday. However, actually this day is Thursday. But I just mention this casually. After all, the movie is fictitious, and there is no need to entangle the date in the movie to be consistent with reality.
View more about Drishyam reviews
