The movie "The Gate" made me understand that a person's greatness or the next outstanding, outstanding, outstanding, outstanding, not bad, depends on how much timeless good things he/she has left (created), whether materially It's still spiritual or informational. In terms of the conservation of mass in physics, no one can leave anything. If the law of entropy increase is ignored, the sun will not send light to the earth, and meteorites will not hit the earth. The earth is an isolated system, a dead planet, and the earth is Nothing can be created. And even if light and meteorites arrive, life on the earth is born and continues to grow, but it is repeated on the basis of the original material. Your excrement and urine irrigate the vegetables, some parts of the excrement and urine become part of the vegetables, and finally you eat it again. The pig eats a lot of cheap vegetables irrigated with excrement and urine. After the pig is slaughtered and eaten by you, it becomes a part of you after digestion. After you die, you are carried into the coffin and buried, and soon decayed and bitten by insects. , A certain part of you becomes a part of the mouse, and even constitutes the sperm of a male mouse. It is from your flesh and blood, so you become a newborn mouse, and this little mouse was accidentally caught one day. A hungry sow stomped to death and ate it, and the nutrients of the little mouse just formed the sow's egg, so you finally became a pig, which was slaughtered by humans when you grew up. From this point of view, Buddhism’s theory of reincarnation can indeed be explained, but I am opposed to what pigs have cultivated for many lives and be a good pig in every life, and finally reincarnated as a human in the reincarnation of the next life. I've been a bad person all my life, so I was reborn as a pig in a certain life. I firmly oppose this view, which is the same as the Christian paradise theory. This kind of intangible, invisible, unverifiable and unfalsifiable thing, you can treat it as dispensable, because it does not disturb your life, others Believe let them believe, at least let them fear and do good. It's just that most people don't believe in this one anymore, so they don't hesitate to do evil. How can there be any hellish fire? Let's talk about the good fortune and life in this life, regardless of the younger generations flooding the sky. Confucianism and Mohism have a very interesting big difference in the theory of ghosts and gods, but the ultimate interest is the same. Confucianism does not believe in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but it attaches great importance to the rituals of sacrifices. The respect for the undead of the ancestors is the Qingming Festival of the Chinese nation. In ancient times, it was three years of filial piety. The Mohist believes in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but despise the rituals of sacrificial rites, admire festival funerals, and deny three-year filial piety, which is a waste of human resources. In fact, it has been overthrown in modern times. The biggest difference between Confucianism and Mohism is that Confucianism respects the king and the Mohism respects the people. Therefore, Confucianism respects the father along with his biological mother, elders, and elder brothers because of the respect for the king. , Pay attention to the special ritual and music, and then it appears noble and conforms to the etiquette. The Mohist respects the people and advocates "saving use", "festival burial", "no pleasure", and "enduring hardship". Therefore, the king should be brought to the same status as the common people and the king should be the same as the common people. If you just think about it, you will know that everyone likes to be flattered, and those in power prefer it. Therefore, the Confucian and Mohist families that were once attacked during the Qin Shihuang era will soon become the Confucianist and the Mohist will quickly die out. Of course, this is also related to the fact that most of Confucianism came from the children of scholarly families, and most of Mohism came from the children of farmers. That is to say, it is related to the basics and the direction of maintenance is different, and even if the farmers are born and believe in Confucianism, they think (goods and emperors) to use the power of the king to build a scholarly family and protect the descendants of generations. Of course, all of this They are all supplemented (basic disks), and their biggest goal is to make the whole world together. The Mohists have never thought about their own selfishness. All they think about is for the people. No matter how hard and tired they are, they are willing to die. Even if they die, they will not be "dead". From this point of view, Mohism is indeed more than Confucianism. Great and even more earth-shaking chivalrous spirit. Too much nonsense. I give the example of pigs and mice to illustrate that it is impossible for humans to create things. The so-called creation is from nothing. It is almost impossible to make it from scratch, because it is restricted by the law of conservation of mass and energy in physics. It is absolutely impossible for you to create a balloon out of thin air if you give you a mass of air. So from scratch, this is a matter of God, a hypothesis of the mystery of the origin of the universe-the big bang of the universe, this is not our human business, we humans can only transform things on the basis of things, which we call creation, Including all invisible mental thinking logic and other metaphysical things called information, such as thought, literature, music, programming language, etc., are all based on material, without material, they have no support. When I say this, many materialists immediately clap their hands and applaud, but I am about to slap them back. I want to say that without thinking and logic, it is impossible to transform things. Pigs, mice and dogs cannot build a pile of snow. Snow pigs, snow squirrels, snow dogs, and even snowmen, but people can build snowmen, snow pigs, snow squirrels, and snow dogs. This is called creation. Give a child a handful of mud, he can squeeze a lot of things, including a little mud pig, and a little pig can't squeeze a little mud man. Give you a pen, you can write and draw, write to your lover far away, or draw a sketch of him/her to relieve lovesickness. And given you a guitar, you can play a sound, but not necessarily a harmonious and beautiful sound. To play a harmonious and beautiful sound, you have to learn the knowledge of rhythm. Musical knowledge, the intangible acoustic psychological and logical knowledge, is a large amount of human experience. The accumulated products come from the sounds emitted by various objects and the laws of these sounds. It is precisely these laws that human beings have mastered, and only then can they manipulate and organize these sounds, and music can be born. Then mankind learned to record and preserve the music before they had a music score, and later generations can restore and play the music of their predecessors based on the music score. Then mankind learned to save music records before they had turntables, phonographs, CDs, and amplifiers. Now only a mobile computer and a pair of headphones can enjoy Beethoven’s music two hundred years ago, and Beethoven stayed. It's just a music score. What you hear is an mp3 or other format song (media file) that was recorded by later generations when they restored their performance (such as vinyl records) and then digitized (binary) saved on the mobile computer. From vinyl records to media files is a kind of creation (analog signal carrier to digital signal carrier), from media files to the sound of your earphones being heard by you is another kind of creation (digital signal carrier to analog signal carrier to restoration Make a sound). Creation is ubiquitous in the human world, changing human life habits and making human life better. And whoever creates a greater amount of eternal good things, whether it is material, spiritual or information, can be called great. The following is outstanding, outstanding, outstanding, outstanding, not bad. And if a person makes a lot of money, is he/she considered great? No, because according to the law of conservation of mass, all money in the world is made by yarn printing machines. As long as mankind wants to, mankind can use all the substances on the earth to make money, and even shine the sun into the earth’s sunlight and into the earth. The meteorites are all used to make money, but they are all limited. Because the sunlight conversion rate is almost zero, it is hard to imagine that someone would build a cauldron like the 500-meter spherical radio telescope in Guizhou to receive sunlight (light particles) for conversion. Into matter. What humans often do is to build a dam to form a big earth pot to collect rainwater from the sky for irrigation of farmland or daily drinking water. And a meteorite has to wait for many years or even hundreds of thousands of years. Most meteorites have been burned into gas in the climatic layer, and it takes a long time for its dust to slowly fall to the earth. And a person collects all the money printed by the yarn printing machine into his own hands, which is equivalent to owning all the water of the oceans, rivers, lakes, ponds and wells on the earth, not giving others a way to survive, but in fact he can only Use very small, very small. I know that there are many people who have this kind of idea, but no one has really done it, because other people will kill him immediately. Even the ancient Chinese emperor who is known as the land of the land may not be the king of land, he is also named. , Not in the true sense. So from this point of view, the more people who occupy the limited resources on the planet, the It is the person who harms the interests of others more. In ancient times, under the power of feudal society, there would be slaves (Chinese slaves and maids, black slaves in Europe and the United States), and only under the local tyrants and evil gentry in modern China would there be white-haired women. And even if the rich, such as Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing and Jack Ma, their total amount is only a small part of the limited resources of the entire world, and some resources are based on other people’s resources. The valuation of a great company is based on manpower. Resources (talents) are also included, and this valuation is ultimately counted on Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing, and Jack Ma. If all of those human resources are dissected, the rest will be allocated to these rich people. Quasi-humans go in to organize and integrate operations, so that the rich can enjoy it slowly. Even if the amount is very, very large, it is a pile of meaningless garbage. These things can no longer bring the rich people material or spiritual enjoyment, but will become His burden, because the rich can only enjoy a very, very little bit, most of them will slowly rot, and these things can no longer create material and spiritual products for the people of the world, the rich must take this pile Rubbish is converted into money that can bring material or spiritual enjoyment, so he must sell this pile of rubbish, let another capitalist take over, and then let manpower in to organize and integrate operations to create material or spiritual for the people of the world Products, this is called a limited company. And to define whether a rich person is great or not, certainly does not mean that the richer he is, the greater he is. This has been overthrown by me. On the contrary, the richer he is, the more he damages the interests of others. They are anti-human beings, and humans should put such people to death sooner and sooner. As an intermediary of material resources, money is equivalent to material resources in peacetime, and is equivalent to a pile of waste paper in wars, and gold immediately takes its place. In fact, gold has always taken its place in peace. During the period of time, gold is invisible, and it only appeared during the war. And if one day God uses gold fingers to turn all the stones on the earth into gold, then silver will immediately take the place of gold. If a rich man is great or not, then he has to talk about his heart. A person who wants to take all the limited resources in the world into his own and keeps doing so, everyone gets it and punishes them, and even wants to get half or even one-third and one-fifth of the world. One... Don't let one out of ten people go, everyone should get it, one hundredth... one thousandth... Don't let the one out of ten thousand people wait. There are 6 billion people in the world, he gets one ten thousandth, he is tantamount to infringing on the interests of 600,000 people, you can imagine a small city of 600,000 people, the resources are his, which means that he is the only one to live. Everyone else has to starve to death. Do you think these 600,000 people will kill him? In fact, there are people with all the resources in this small city of 600,000 people, and the other 600,000 people in this small city didn’t want to kill him. Why? Consider whether Bill Gates’ wealth can easily buy all the resources of a poor and backward city of 600,000 people. How many times his wealth is yours? It is tens of thousands of times that of many people, so have you ever thought about killing him? no. Why did we not want to kill him, because Bill Gates is also "atoning for sins" while accumulating wealth. He is also creating material and spiritual resources (wealth) for us. We use his operating system and his company. The various conveniences brought to us by our products are also creating wealth for many of us. Therefore, our 600,000 people did not starve to death, but lived happily. On the contrary, we must be grateful for all the things he brought us. convenient. People can play happily based on this kind of cooperation. Moreover, my calculations like that are not correct. It is very rough and rude. His assets have not been cleaned of human resources. After the removal, it is impossible for him to reach one in 10,000. Moreover, the resources on this earth are my money. To calculate, too many invisible resources have not been calculated, how can all the mountains, rivers and lakes be calculated with money? Counting these invisible resources, how can Bill Gates buy one ten-thousandth of the earth? No one in this world can, and our 600,000 people are able to live by relying on these invisible resources that have not been accounted for. But here I still hate Li Ka-shing, a capitalist who collects money everywhere. In all my heart and soul, I feel that he is just a business villain. What memorable product does he leave for people all over the world? None of them. At least, when I was born in the mainland, I have never felt the convenience he brought me most intuitively. Maybe it was indirectly but I didn't know it. Maybe netizens could point it out. Perhaps some netizens said that Li Ka-shing invested in certain cities in the once-poor mainland, which promoted the economic development of the mainland, and I also invisibly shared this convenience in this economic development. Wow, this hat is so tall, it is taller than the tallest building in Shanghai, it really makes me look up. And what I thought was that he collected a few waves of harvests and then left. He got what he wanted, and the mainland got what she wanted. It was just a fair deal. Besides, this is also his Li Ka-shing Shun With this trend of reform and opening up, and using this wind to make the tide, he is a fool if he doesn't make it, because there will be too many other people making it. It is not that he alone can control this great trend. However, I think people like Bill Gates, Jobs, and Jack Ma seem to be following the trend, but they don’t seem to follow the trend. Instead, they have started to lead new trends and brought the most intuitive convenience to the world. This is what they left us. The things they bring us are like poetry and novels. It is not Li Ka-shing's kind of only form but no content. The things they left us are spiritual and some. Materially and spiritually, it can inspire us, and materially we can fully enjoy and be immersed in it. Yes, we have to leave something for future generations, even though Gates, Jobs, and Jack Ma left us something other than what I said at the beginning: A large amount of timeless good things, whether material or spiritual. In other words, what they left us is not very eternal, or not good enough. For example, their products are prone to obsolescence, the Win Fighter operating system and Apple mobile phones have been updated, and Jack Ma’s Taobao shopping has been maintained and developed more humanely. I don’t know if other companies will create new ones in the future. What about subverting the Three Views and replacing them with more convenient shopping methods? This is not very clear, but the possibility is very high, because now we see that the rudiment of the subversion of the three views is the drone delivery service. And the spiritual encouragement they leave us is not unique to them. Their noble spiritual qualities have been in many other people throughout the ages. They are only typical of this era. Of course, their spiritual qualities do have a certain kind. Eternity, but if they are to be compared with the great men in the entire history of mankind, they must be compared, because those great men have more eternal things than them, and will occupy them in the future. Important location. However, in this era, they have fulfilled the task of "large weight" of "good things", and they have brought "good things" to people in the whole world or a country. In future generations, let the future generations comment, at least we have recognized it in this era. Yes, I think we still have to leave something for future generations, whether it is material, spiritual or information, and I know that a large amount of eternal good things is difficult to create and leave. After all, most of us are not geniuses and have limited aptitudes, and even have major flaws, and most of our things have been picked up by the sages and great men, leaving behind their heavy pen and ink, let alone transcend, even if we climb on the shoulders of them (giants) You can’t go up, too high, the mountains are standing up, let alone Einstein’s theory of relativity, calculus can scare most of us ordinary people, but this does not mean that God closed all our windows, on the contrary What gives us many open windows and doors is that we can work in the fields we are good at, silently leave our own essence, add a little bit of color to the world, can be seen and appreciated by others, and can also be inspiring. other people. Jim Morrison, the soul vocalist of The Gate Rock Band, is a great musician, but he is also an obvious loser, the typical negative of our lives. He is bohemian and rebellious. He is a drunkard who smokes and drinks at the concert, and is a drug addict behind the stage. He is unscrupulous on the stage of the concert, and his private life is extremely chaotic. He betrayed his girlfriend for many years. How can such a person be we want to learn? Is it the object of? but It is when we watch this movie and fully understand his family situation, we can find that his bohemian and rebelliousness comes from his fragility. His dad is a naval officer and he is very strict with him. He is that kind of rigid. In the words of Wenders’ movie "Million Dollar Hotel", Jim Morrison’s father’s powerful ego shattered Jim Morrison’s fragile ego in his childhood and made Jim Morrison Use extreme methods-bohemian, rebellious-against his father to build up a strong and tenacious self, but this self seems strong and tenacious, and in the final analysis is the other extreme-fragile. In "Million Dollar Hotel", the son of a billionaire media tycoon is in exactly the same situation as Jim Morrison. They are equally bohemian and rebellious, and they are also drug-addicted, but they are equally talented. They are poets, talented, and sensitive. Fragile, but resisted to the death. The son of billions of media Daxiang jumped from the top of the building, not so much that his fragile ego was crushed by reinforced concrete, but rather he was crushed by the powerful ego of the media tycoon. Although Jim Morrison did not choose to commit suicide, his self actually has this strong tendency. It is obvious from watching this movie and checking his information. His reflection on life in poetry and philosophy makes him There is a Haizi-like passion for burning life and yearning for death, and he is also practicing it, but it is different from the way of the media tycoon’s son. Jim Morrison chose the Haizi-like path-burning himself madly-in music creation Show yourself as much as you want in the stage performance (tenacious and fragile), so the power of this kind of art is very intuitive, real and shocking, very contagious, so the door rock band, like Haizi, quickly accumulates a large number of fans, but these Fans don't know that they are burning themselves to march toward death, and then achieve the eternity of life. In the end, Haizi committed suicide in Shanhaiguan, at the age of 25; Jim Morrison ran out of candlelight of his life under long-term alcohol and drug abuse, at the age of 27. One leaves a lot of excellent poems, the other leaves a lot of excellent music, leaving a strong mark in each other's areas of expertise, and these things are eternal in nature, and it is not unbelievable. In fact, thinking of Haizi, Jim Morrison, and the son of the billionaire media tycoon in The Million Dollar Hotel, I suddenly thought of something in physics-Rupert’s Tears. Yes, this kind of thing is on the earth. The hardest things are harder than diamonds, and the texture is transparent and bright like diamonds. It can withstand 8 tons of pressure and cannot be broken by bullets at close range. But it is also the most fragile thing on the earth, as long as you find its tiny and tiny weakness, use a little bit. Force it to smash the whole thing, it's really amazing. However, the birth of Rupert's Tears must also be in deep water. These are two extremes, and they have to be embarrassing. Finally, I hope that we can all learn our lessons and not go to two extremes, and quietly cultivate our own world in our field of expertise, and be able to paint a small color for the world, as long as it is small (of course, if it can be greatly improved) OK), shining a little light of color, adding a little excitement to the world, and a few people appreciate and love (of course it’s much better), it’s enough, because I think, if We cannot leave a large amount of eternal good things to future generations, whether material, spiritual or information, but we can leave our essence to the few people of our age, give comfort, and each other Keep warm. Finally, I endorse with Zhang Zao’s verse: I think my good luck will come one day and I will be read and loved by the few outstanding people of Liao Ruoxing who I have imagined all my life.
View more about The Doors reviews
