I was very confused to see many people saying that the old man "is not guaranteed at the end of the festival".
The first and most important thing is the director of the film. The director is not an old man!
Since the director is not him, does it have anything to do with the old man if the plot is protracted and dull?
A good sports film has to add so many love elements to it to make people sick, and it is not what the old man meant!
I don’t know how many people watched this film because of the old man. Whether you like him or not, from an objective point of view, is there any problem with his performance?
As long as the two opening scenes, one is getting up early, peeing and nagging, and the other is kicking over the coffee table because the coffee table gets in the way, it basically establishes the character's personality and lifestyle, weird and stubborn.
Is such a vivid acting skill unqualified?
Since they are qualified, why should they criticize "the late festival is not guaranteed"?
Just like a "famous saying": "I'm just an actor, and I don't even have acting skills. Why do you want me to sing?"
The old man is just an actor in the film, he has done everything he can do, portraying the role in three points. The quality of the finished film is not good. Can you blame an actor with a brilliant performance?
View more about Trouble with the Curve reviews
