How can the gap be compared? The production itself is more than six-point grade. The story line is a bit old-fashioned. One film critic said that it is quite clear. It is a story of the loneliness of the king being framed by the nobles. The problem is that it did not choose the right king. It is not compatible with history and literature, leading many people to accept it.
But what is the level of a film that should be scored with one's conscience alone? There can definitely be four stars.
Slow narrative? It doesn’t exist, and the rhythm is good. The actor himself is a bit of a criticism. He actually fits the image of a benevolent king that the movie wants to express, but he feels that Hyung O’s force value is completely unmatched. This is also a problem that the creator chooses the wrong king. . The biggest advantage can be said that the various scenes are as realistic as possible: that kind of fighting can be said to be very common, but shouldn't it be this kind of messy play in reality.
There are also some interesting little details, such as French descent playing the King of England, the British playing the French prince, etc. I am a little bit curious because the main characters in it are all too wise. Princess Catherine is so thought-provoking, and women of that era are all It's amazing to be able to say such things.
View more about The King reviews
