I am interested in the different endings of the two episodes: In the first episode, the only surviving young man escaped with difficulty. He encountered a rich man who almost lost his hand on the train, and followed him to the bathroom in the same way. kill. The original victim became an avenger. But in the second episode, because the surviving woman has a lot of inheritance, the final outcome of the resistance is to buy the contract that originally belonged to the opponent, and transform from the hunted into the hunter. Compared to the first episode, this is Qualitative change. Therefore, compared to the first episode, I prefer the second episode. No matter what theme the director wants to express, this kind of ending treatment is more surprising and more shocking.
View more about Hostel: Part II reviews
