Originally, the classic inferior film in my mind this year was Gus Van Sant's Last Days, which was chaotic from beginning to end. But I can also forgive this technique for expressing the situation a few days before a drug abuse rock musician committed suicide. Of course, the movie is absolutely unsightly. For more than an hour, the protagonist Michael Pitt ran with the house and talked to himself. There were several impulses to leave, but in the end he still wanted to know how he committed suicide and stayed low. After watching Wolf Creek, I think this is the worst movie I have ever watched this year. The director seems to be insulting the wisdom of the audience. The protagonist of the story is three backpackers, including an Australian man and two British girls. They want to drive from the southwest of Australia across the Australian continent to the Cairns in the northeast. Unfortunately, on the way, they were spotted by a perverted murderer in Wolf Creek. In the chase, both women were killed, and the man was rescued in the end.
※ ※ Warning: The following content includes the plot description of the movie ※ ※ (However, if you don't watch this movie, please continue to read the article) The
first forty-five minutes of the movie is an ordinary journey of a backpacker, and it is almost sleepy. There is nothing special about the scenery along the way. The Wolfe Creek Crater they want to see is a bit of a glance, but they have all seen them in the scenery documentary. After that, they couldn't drive the car, and a hillbilly who looked like a well-wisher asked Ying to help them repair the car, but he was a perverted killer.
Of course, as a horror film, there is no shortage of violence, chase, escape, and bloody, but the director's approach is not flattering. The encounters of the three rucksacks imprisoned separately were only presented one after another, and it seemed that they did not know how to interlace the stories that occurred at the same time. The two women were tortured and killed for several days, but the tied male protagonist did not appear as if he did not exist; after waiting two or three days, when the director had time to shoot him, he tried to break free from the rope and nail. One of the female characters had been able to get out of the trap, and temporarily distracted the crazy demon who wanted to find the car key to escape, but she spent a lot of time calmly playing with the actor’s camcorder. In the next shot, she suddenly became extremely anxious. I tried to drive with multiple car keys randomly, and finally realized that the crazy demon was sitting in the back seat and stabbed her with a single knife. He has been clearly drawn away, and he is not a ghost who can clone himself, how can he come back unknowingly? There are many cars for her to choose, why would the madman know which one she would choose and sit in in advance? There are other common-sense mistakes that are also very eye-catching. The night they encountered the madman was pitch black, but suddenly a round of full moon images were inserted. On a full moon night, the road should be visible instead of pitch black. Two or three days later, when another female actor was escaping for her life, a total solar eclipse lens was inserted. You must know that a total solar eclipse can only occur on the new moon, and it will take two weeks before the full moon! I wonder if the director and screenwriter are really ignorant or when the audience is ignorant?
What I hate the most is that the film constantly emphasizes that it is an adaptation of real events. The propaganda line says: Based on true events. If you want to tell a lie, you must at least say it thoroughly. If I want to believe that it is true, I should write the story from the point of view of the only survivor, the male protagonist. The two women are dead, the male protagonist is not present during the killing, and the crazy demon is still at large. How did you know the so-called true events? It's a lie with eyes open.
Originally, what attracted me to the show was that this film was nominated for multiple awards by the Australian Film Institute this year. If it is announced tomorrow night that Wolf Creek has been selected as Australia’s best director or screenplay of the year, I would no longer have to watch Australian movies.
Stannum amateur rating: Stack stack (10 stacks full score) The
original text comes from personal blog, if you have any responses, please leave a message in the original text, thank you!
http://blog.cosine-inn.com/2005/11/224/
View more about Wolf Creek reviews
