Last night I finished watching this nearly two-hour movie with my computer on the bed. I don’t understand why I saw Peas friends so disappointed in this movie. At least, this is a movie that didn’t make me yawn and asked me to plug in the power and insist on seeing the final movie.
The film has a tight rhythm (some people say it’s a protracted plot, I don’t understand it at all). I like the feeling of being led by the nose when watching a movie. I want to think about it and understand what is going on. , But I don’t have time at all. Soon you will encounter the second problem, and you have no idea about the first problem. Although many of the details of this film can't stand scrutiny, it is not the kind of film that is still amazed after watching it many times, but you will never be disappointed when you watch it the first time.
Lao Pa's performance in the film is still very good. The first scene reminded me of the unruly policeman in "The Line of Fire". This time I got a little higher and became a university professor and an FBI psychiatrist. There are comments on IMDB.COM that most of the films nowadays are scripts, special effects, directors, or something to create an actor. It has been rare to see an actor relying on his acting skills to prop up the entire film, Al Pacino Is one of them.
The plot of the film is well grasped in the general direction, and in the end it can be justified, not as inexplicable as the super bad movie "The Wicker Man". However, many details are still quite unreliable. For example, Lao Pa broke his mobile phone for no reason. In fact, there are no more questions about this mobile phone. (It seems that I just want to borrow a teaching assistant’s mobile phone to come over to play, so that I can make an advertisement for my flip phone, and an advertisement for the sliding lid of the teaching assistant.) There are also beautiful assistants who come to the professor’s house and put her clothes one by one. Taking off is more casual than the professor. First, it is not suitable to tease others in such a critical moment. Second, the professor is dressed so thickly, and obviously the weather is not so hot. (Just Hollywood elements, I want to add some beauty highlights.) Then there are those boring tensions. When I watch it, I feel very good. I don’t know who wants to kill him so much. But at the end, I think about it in reverse. Those actions such as bombing cars and shooting guns are completely unnecessary, increasing the operating cost of imitating the killer. (It's also a Hollywood element. I didn't know that a lens could be added there to ruin a sports car, so I had to do it.) In addition, the illusion that the professors killed by imitating the killer is actually very naive and full of errors. You can just investigate it. Knowing the result, the Lao Spicy Federal agent didn't need to run over and point a gun at his old friend. (It seems that we need to let Pa Biao act again, but
she is really good.) There are more suspects in the film, which may point out one or two shots, but we should also make the audience suspicious and let the audience spend time. Thinking character. For example, at the beginning, the taxi driver had two Rs on his neck, and Frank, the school policeman, was also a guy with a tattoo. This kind of character setting is actually more like a novel, because the novel has time to describe a lot of characters, but copying it to the movie is still quite new and may not be appropriate, but I am quite comfortable.
http://imapollo.blogbus.com/logs/5619430.html
View more about 88 Minutes reviews
