Walking last night, passing by the Beiying Factory and entering the disc shop, there was "The Name of the Rose", and it was D9! Take it without hesitation. Since reading novels at this time last year, I have coveted movies for a long time. It's a pity to stay up late to watch the movie, but in general it's pretty good. The film deletes William's observations of the horse at the beginning of the novel and the inferences drawn from it, which is of course harmless, because the following scenes are enough to show William's insightfulness. Several murders were handled well in the movie, the rhythm was good, and the selection of actors was good enough, basically in line with my imagination when I was reading, and a few were far beyond my expectations. For example, it is easy for the guy who speaks all kinds of languages to find an actor who looks like this in real life. What is unsatisfactory is William and Adso's exploration of the library maze. The film only solved everything through the loss of Adesso and William when they first entered and a deciphering when the inspiration struck later. The feeling when reading a novel is not like this. The illustrations in the book depict the strangeness and mystery of the labyrinth, which is quite complicated. It is too difficult to express this meaning perfectly with pictures. Sean Connery was great, serious, shrewd, and bold, but the impression that Adso gave me was panic besides panic, and the character was slightly thin. P.S.: The part between Adso and the dumb girl is a bit too long, it's completely unnecessary, just take a few shots. Of course, as a commercial film, no matter how long it is filmed, there is nothing wrong with it. After all, some people like to watch these...
View more about The Name of the Rose reviews
