Originally, I just flipped through it casually, and was completely shocked by the few short comments that came up to the front. The most frightening thing is that there are still quite a few people who agree with those views. I hope that the short comment can also add an objection option.
I'm a lazy person. I didn't want to write anything. I have no obligation to correct other people's thoughts. But given that this is an animated feature film, it is a fairy tale. The people watching this film may have growing children, and maybe there are adults who believe in fairy tales. They don't want to ruin their views on this animation, so I wrote it after the second brush.
[] is the content of quoting some short comments.
⚐First point:
Controversy: the right to use the magic flower
Someone pointed out that [you can snatch the flowers planted by a witch because you are a king, and the witch is so pitiful. 】
For this reason, I watched the opening of the film three times, and the magic flower obviously grew by itself after the sun fell. It is understandable if the witch takes care of it and grows up, but the flower has not even been taken care of by the witch. May I ask where the ownership of the witch was obtained.
in conclusion:
The magic flower is not planted by a witch. Witches have the right to use it, as do others. The person who put forward that idea didn't read the plot clearly.
⚐The second point:
Controversy: Rapunzel and her adoptive mother’s affective mother’s behavior is justified
Someone pointed out that [the princess has been raised for 18 years and has no affection for her adoptive mother, and she embraced her almost unfamiliar biological parents. The adoptive mother fell off the tower just symbolically stretched out her hand and can only say that this is a white-eyed wolf dreaming of a princess]
[Although the witch possesses the princess for her own benefit, it is good for the princess in addition to restricting her freedom. Why does the princess have no feelings for her, at least get along day and night for more than ten years. 】
[The story is about a daughter who killed her adoptive mother in order to return to the home of her biological parents who had a better life, and her adoptive mother fell apart for a man]
①First of all, we need to talk about the relationship between Rapunzel and her adoptive mother. In the film, the adoptive mother said "I love you" to Rapunzel more than once, and Rapunzel's fixed answer pattern is "I love you more". And it is obvious that Rapunzel's expression has changed. It can be seen from the expression that Rapunzel is slightly uncertain about her foster mother's feelings for her, and thinks she loves each other more. And before the truth was discovered, Rapunzel was completely normal to the witch. The daughter's attitude towards her mother was obedient and trusted. I will blame myself and be ashamed for not listening to "mother".
It is even more nonsense to kill the adoptive mother for a man. The cause of the witch’s death is that Eugene cut Rapunzel’s long hair in order to prevent Rapunzel from being imprisoned by the witch. After the collapse, he was thrown down by his hair and fell down the tower. It has nothing to do with Rapunzel. Rapunzel was sitting on the ground guarding Eugene when he fell, and he only saw the moment of the fall when he looked back. Rapunzel's expressions and movements can be seen. Rapunzel was shocked and sad. After all, they are "relatives" who have spent more than ten years together day and night.
Conclusion: According to the initial daily routine and subsequent development, Rapunzel does not have no feelings for witches.
②Furthermore, it is the legitimacy of the witch's behavior. It is impossible to understand why so many people complain about witches. [Hugging affectionately with my almost unfamiliar biological parents] [To return to the home of the biological parents for a better life]
These claims are only based on the fact that Rapunzel's original family is the royal family, and he speculates with a gloomy mentality about Rapunzel's motives for returning to his biological family. Probably what these people need is similar to Rapunzel's discovery that his biological parents are the king and queen, and the adoptive mother is just a "lonely and helpless" woman. The aura of the Virgin erupts, abandoning their biological parents, ignoring their thoughts and pain for more than ten years. Ignore the plot of being abducted, deceived, imprisoned and living with the so-called foster mother again.
The king and queen spent more than ten years in the pain of losing their children, and prayed every night that the children could be found. Every year, a sky lantern is put on the children’s birthday, and I pray that the princess can find the sky lantern to go home. If the same kind of relationship is replaced by a farmer couple, those people can understand it. A typical "you are rich, you have the right to have status, so your pain can be ignored. You must bear the persecution unconditionally" way of thinking.
A witch is like a trafficker who steals children and imprisoned a person for more than ten years for their own benefit. The witch’s cleverness lies in his good use of Rapunzel’s feelings, allowing Rapunzel to stay by his side willingly under the rhetoric and sugar-coated shells. Trick Rapunzel and use Rapunzel's obedience to her "mother" to suppress her desire for freedom. Imprisoning a person on a small tower is using Rapunzel from beginning to end, not to mention that after Rapunzel knows the truth, he uses an iron chain to lock Rapunzel and prepares to take her away like an animal. This is the so-called "maternal love", this is the so-called "just poor means." This is the "nice to her" part of the people who complained. Do they have Stockholm syndrome? (Manual smile)
Conclusion: The witch is not justified to Rapunzel's series of actions. The so-called "maternal glory" of some people is probably more means than sincere.
This world is so wonderful. Some people spurned the three views of the director and the adaptor in the film review of "The Woman Married to Dashan", and some people in the film review of "Tangled" separated Rapunzel from his parents and imprisoned them. Rapunzel's treatment for the witch for more than ten years has been uneven. And tried to kidnap Rapunzel morally.
Those who hold the above-mentioned views are not stupid or Virgin, but bad, and use goodness and moral distortion as tools to oppress others. People with superior external conditions can be ignored even if they suffer persecution and misfortune. Anyone who has done bad things can be justified as long as they pretend to show their weak side. Good blindness is more terrifying than evil. At least the evil is not clothed in hypocrisy and gorgeous.
"Tangled" is not a fairy tale that falls into the cliche. Rapunzel in the story has his own dream, brave and capable. Even Eugene, the male protagonist, is not the prince who saved the princess, but an accidental captive of Rapunzel in achieving independence. "Tangled" as Disney's fiftieth animated feature film, it can be seen that it is a work of heart, and this story is also a fairy tale. I hope it can continue to convey the beauty like other fairy tales.
View more about Tangled reviews
