last sentence appeared:
JKRowling invites you to return to the wizarding world.
I think this movie is destined to be a success because of this,
because the world is back. And
you can say that this is a kind of consumption of feelings, but it is different
because each of Rowling’s books is advanced,
with deeper themes and more realistic meanings
. After watching the premiere in the UK,
I was extremely excited. I am also convinced that she wants to write it as an adult fairy tale,
but what about the story?
I have too much to say
[spoiler alert! ]
Let us talk about a good place to go
to see the film in half of all people should read the book or movie, whether HP's
so many of them before infiltrated elements feels very familiar to surprise
some of my own eggs are found :
At the beginning of the story, the headlines of the Daily Prophet were all Grindelwald and Creatures at large
Newt. A woman asked: "My friend, are you a seeker after truth?"
He replied: "I'm more of a Chaser, really. "
I didn't react at first, but I heard a foreign girl behind me laugh
and then I suddenly realized
that the seeker this terrifying woman said is the seeker of truth.
When Newt heard that the seeker thought of the seeker, he replied that I was actually a chaser.
(Hey, at that moment, there is a feeling that the world is back)
Restored many spells I have seen before: accio Expelliarmus Obliviate (I have seen a survey before and said that the most frequent spell in the HP series is also accio. The flying curse is really very Practical hahaha) I
personally think that Newt’s box is a bit like Hermione’s giant purse, but the comparison between the two is really insignificant. Was the real Moody locked up by Crowney in the past? In the curse box?
Americans call muggle no-magic, which is quite straightforward. . . (Let’s look at the news and it’s No-Maj, oh my hearing...)
When it comes to the magic school, Queenie said Ilvermorny is the best,
Newt smiled slightly and shook his head and said "I'm pretty sure Hogwarts is the best wizarding school there is. "Oh my God, that expression on the little freckles was so handsome that it came out of the sky without hesitation, but
she was very gentle and then Queenie deliberately referred to Hogwarts as Hog~wash~ (of course there is no subtitles so I am not sure)
that Auror I mentioned Dumbledore during the interrogation of Newt~ I
said: I don’t know why Dumbledore likes you so much
. The style and feel are in the same line as the previous work, unlike the cursed child, which has a sense of fascination and
a good picture of New York in 1926. The steamy station. The harsh bank manager. The bustling crowd seems to belong to the noble class. There are also dumb-looking workers who walk into the Wuqiqi factory with a strong sense of the times
In short well-feelings appropriate There are a lot of nice details nice clip
but these together but did not look in so perfect.
Take a look at the
main plot of its plot: the main line is the small freckles to catch the escaped animals one by one... The middle was almost executed by the Ministry of Magic (this is too ridiculous. The British Death Eaters are just jailed. Why the Americans are going to kill them) The
other line is that Grindelwald is looking for obsecurus in the neurotic anti-wizard family, and then the child is forced to explode and was driven to annihilate by the Ministry of Magic... I don’t know yet. Annihilation, annihilation,
but in the latter line... The development of the story is almost unaffected by Newt...
I think the rhythm of the double main line and the large amount of information is a bit aggressive since it is going to shoot 5 parts. It could have been an adventure comedy, but I made some preparations for the following story. It turned out to be so dark. When I saw the anti-wizard family, I inevitably had a lot of doubts and guards, so I didn’t see the appearance of those cute magical creatures. Can relax completely. These two main lines are divided too evenly, just like two forces are impacting each other to suppress the people who like it, and people who don't like it may feel a bit confused.
It is said that the two main lines of the story with a
lot of information should be very compact, but I found that it is always procrastinating in the development of the plot... It takes a long time to show off the skills... It
is normal for all kinds of animals to come out, but it is normal but obsecurus broke out. It’s a bit too long. I flew here for a while and where I flew. I know I want to show the intensity of this destruction, but I always feel a little ink stain (or maybe I’m tired after seeing it).
Another problem is that I’ve dug too much. Too deliberate.
For example, the girl in the photo (seeing the news of foreign media and discovering that her last name is Lestrange is actually from the dark magic family of Belaf's family, this pit is big) For
example, who is the magic wand under the bed? What's the secret ? Human secret
For example, the black smoke that drifted away at the end... To
tell the truth, I don't really like this deliberate suspense approach. It feels that only those who have no confidence in their own works love it and arouse everyone's curiosity to watch the next one.
Foreshadowing and digging are not the same. Foreshadowing is quietly prospering for thousands of miles. Rowling did a good job in HP. Just like what I said when I was chatting with my friends two days ago: When you read the sixth book The Horcrux that I only found out actually appeared in the second part and was destroyed. After watching many interviews, the actors said Rowling was like a gold mine. Every time she came to the set, they would ask a lot of questions beyond the script, and she could answer them without thinking. She clearly contained in her head the whole world and everyone’s life experience. There are many, many things. She didn’t write it into the script of the book, but the cause and effect of all things are in her mind. That’s why she I wrote so many foreshadowings in HP, that is not how deliberately said eh~ Or I bury a clue here but in her heart those things should be like this.
But digging is just the opposite. It is always obvious to the point where it is abrupt. Like Lestrange mentioned in a lot of space here, what does she have to do with this movie? It's easy to be confusing and playful. It's obvious that you can inadvertently flash pictures of her or the envelope with her name when you organize the box. Anyway, it will definitely be picked up by the fans. And it's not more fun to pick it out like this. Why bother to do it like this To be blunt... I
digress: I may also know that deliberately digging holes is not necessarily good, so like Marvel likes to dig all the holes into the last egg without destroying the integrity of the feature film, and openly invite you to watch my sequel or linkage. Everyone likes this kind of easter eggs in other movies (so now they have developed double easter eggs).
Speaking of Marvel compared to the Dr. Strange that I watched last week, I feel that for viewers who haven’t watched HP, the two may be no different... They are both popcorn movies and even Dr. Strange will be more friendly to non-fan audiences because they are also in Under the overhead view of the world (also popular British actor as the male lead) Dr. Strange's story is more clear and complete, and the amount of information just feels worth learning.
Of course, except for some flaws in the way of telling, it is still a good story.
It may be that HP's book is really well written, and FB will be a bit dwarfed.
After all, a two-hour movie and a hundreds of pages of novels still have many limitations,
just like the adaptations of various big IPs at home and abroad. How much can it satisfy the readers,
so I still hope that Rowling will have time to write it as a book (covering his face).
After reading this book, he was completely fanned by Newt
. It seems that many people don’t like Newt on the Internet. Say that he is not confident or that the little freckles can't act at all... (Is it because he is so characteristic that he plays a bit like himself?)
But I just like his personality
very much. He is indeed very different from Harry. Introverted, shy, humble, and peaceful living in his own world. Finally, he chose to set off on the journey alone again, and he could see that he was used to a person who did not rely much on his friends. Forgetting where I saw that Newt was an outsider when he was in Hogwarts. The love for animals may also be because they give him a warmer feeling than the people around him.
One of the biggest differences between Newt and Harry is that the identity of the outsider is that he is not the boy who survived, so no one had expected him to catch Grindelwald. No one looked at him differently and gave him privileges. He was inexplicably sued by Tina to the Ministry of Magic. He was even driven out of the United States by the minister in the end. We don’t know what he will meet in Paris next stop, but he still set off very lightly. He is not a man with a mission. The adventure he chose is only out of interest and love, so I feel that he may be more free and happier than Harry. More mature.
And I suspect that his magic skills are higher than Harry's, and he is proficient in various spells, especially the extended curse on the box is really powerful. If Harry and they took this box to find the Horcrux at the time, they would have set up a tent and He fights wits with all kinds of animals every day, and his reaction speed is super fast. Phantom shifts. It's a slippery. Although it is really stupid to hang the niffler from the lamp, but the overall performance is very good. It also depends on this quick reaction. I caught grindelwald.
I read the original English version without subtitles... I can understand 50%... and I can understand 70-80% with the
thought meeting ... I want to see that the impression is not so perfect, and there is part of the reason why I
want to read it again With subtitles... (crying)
The first time I saw so many people in a British cinema in the middle of the night.
Many boys and girls wearing Gryffindor scarves. When
watching a movie, everyone laughed
together and clapped together at the end.
That moment was a bit like finding
This is Rowling’s magic with his own tribe. It
shouldn’t be the magic
of imagination. It’s a wonderful thing to have a rich imagination for people.
There are two more complaints:
The various mysteries surrounding that little girl are really... cliché... It seems that the director likes to add a little horror and suspense style or the kind of suspense style in domestic pseudo-horror movies. That old grandmother who was possessed by Nagini really deserves to be from the same person (but as timid as I am, I really feel panicked)
and! ! The most intolerable! ! Not only did Grindelwald fail to see that Credence was obsecurus! ! He also said that he would never be a wizard in his life! ! This is too weak! ! Later, I owe you an apology? ! (I really want to roll his eyes...)
View more about Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them reviews
