Preface
In fact, these two versions are similar in general plots (several important time points), and both use flashback techniques, but they are quite different in details. In general, the 1997 version tends to be more ornamental. The 62 years version is more inclined to the plot itself, and personally, I prefer the 62 years. I will write about what I think is quite interesting.
1. In characterization
Let’s talk about the 62-year-old. Actually, I don’t know if it is constrained by some concepts of that era. The love between the male and female protagonists in this version is relatively more subtle. There is not much interaction between the two other than kissing. The small details that the host sometimes reveals (such as the male lead staring at the photo of the female lead when she rolls the bed sheets with Charlotte, and the male lead’s excessive desire to control, etc.), it is difficult to see that the female lead and the male lead are A couple relationship. As a supplement, except for the hero and heroine, the images of the remaining characters have been strengthened. Whether it is Quatley or Charlotte, their images are more vivid. Charlotte’s love for the hero, Quat Lee's weirdness has been more clearly manifested, especially Charlotte, she is simply a contemporary Dong Shi, when I saw it, it really disgusted me.
Let’s talk about the 1997 version. It’s just the opposite of the 62 years. The whole movie is almost a diagonal drama between the male and female protagonists. Except for these two characters, the presence of the remaining characters is extremely low. But it was also the description of these two men who made the whole movie full of strong hormonal atmosphere, and relatively speaking, it improved the entertainment.
Second, in the details
A common feature of the two films is that they are full of a lot of details. However, as mentioned above, because the styles (purposes) of the two films are different, the details of the two films lead in different directions.
The details of 62 years tend to promote (supplement) the plot (development). Compared to 1997, this film shows the male protagonist’s feelings towards the female protagonist in some nuances. Related people (such as the Fallows), extended some plots (such as the performance was introduced in the 97 version, but was emphasized in the 62 version), all of which basically met and contacted Quatley The hostess has done enough to pave the way.
In the 1997 version, the details are mainly used to release hormones (this film is really wanted and slapped by the director, compared with the previous film, this one is more like a porn film), and compared to 62 Nian focused on paving the way for the relationship between the heroine and Quatley. This version focuses on describing the contradiction between the heroine and the heroine (the first version also has it, but it is not so serious). Personally, I prefer the performance of the first part. After all, in the second version, there are too many contradictions between the male and female protagonists, so that in the second half of the whole, almost the male and female protagonists are tearing up, and finally they broke up. It looked like it was logical, but the sudden green hat was even more unpredictable (although I've seen it again, I was still surprised).
end
After reading the first version, I probably guessed why the book "Lolita" would become a banned book. Unlike ordinary prostitutes, in this story, Lolita is not at a disadvantage, on the contrary, she has been manipulating it. , Guiding the professor's feelings, especially in the first version, the professor's clumsy, rough, and direct possessive desire for Lolita, that kind of temporary, hidden happiness, really makes people feel distressed. Finally, the professor sat on the chair and cried bitterly. The plot of tremblingly taking out the check and money really made me feel uncomfortable. After watching the whole movie, I was really victimized in the traditional sense that I was supposed to be in a disadvantaged position. Lolita could not sympathize. It may be because of the vagueness of the wrong sex that this book has become banned in many countries.
Finally quote my favorite passage from these two versions
I watched her, watched and watched. For the rest of my life, wholeheartedly, I love her the most. I am sure, as sure as I am going to die... She can fade, wither, and whatever. But I only looked at her, and the tenderness came to my heart...
0
View more about Lolita reviews
