Frida, is a good-looking movie, but it’s a bit too good to watch, showing off Hollywood's footsteps, but these have not affected it to become the most famous painter's biopic in recent years. In a short time The rapid heating up of the global "Frida fever" is simply another Che Guevara. Frida Kahlo’s creations are mainly self-portraits, expressing women’s own deep emotional experience and life experience, while her partner Diego Rivera is the most representative artist in Mexico and even the entire Latin America, especially good at The huge murals in the form of murals like political movements, social revolutions, and the events of the times enjoy a lofty status in the history of art. Of course, the film is not surprisingly focused on the emotional entanglement between him and Frida. The enhancement of this entertainment element reduces the interpretation of art works to a certain extent, so it is best to watch this kind of film. The solution is to temporarily forget the historical truth of the master. I still remember that when I watched Titus, I felt that Julie Taymor was not good at telling stories. In this film, Frida’s legendary life was originally dazzling. Although the director’s narrative rhythm is still slightly lacking in skill, she It is not easy to make a biopic of a female artist into such a magnificent audiovisual feast. This role seems to be tailor-made for Salma Hayek, but it is a pity that her hard-working performance seems superficial. The most unforgettable after reading the body is the strong color, the flowery dress and the desolate iron voice of Chavela Vargas like a big wave.
View more about Frida reviews
