I have touched on the novel content but did not go deep, but turned to suspense for the sake of the story, which is a pity.
I prefer the first half of the film to describe the part where robots nurture humans. The relationship between humans and machines will be very interesting. What is the difference between humans nurtured by robots and humans nurtured by humans? What will be the same? Will there be any changes to the sense of self-identity of race? The hostess said when I was young, I want to be a robot, similar words, it can be seen that the film did touch on this part of the content, but did not do more in-depth discussion on this, but left it to the audience, more The length of the book is left to suspense.
Of course, the suspense part is a good idea. Although I guessed that the robot is not so harmless, when the robot said in a calm language that the two bullets are the same, it really convinced me. It is also very interesting here. With facial signals and micro-expressions, the calm language is so persuasive, far more persuasive than a nervous and nervous foreign counterpart.
Another interesting thought is, does the robot in the film have emotions? I think it may not be. The most powerful point is that 001 was abandoned to humans when it was not remembered, rather than killed directly. I don’t believe that if the robots started to lay out and use 001 as a chess piece, on the other hand, there is no direct way. Evidence shows that 002 was killed by a robot. It is possible that the corpse was cremated accidentally. Of course, the film finally implies that the robot killed 001, but at that time 001 was raised by humans and tried to abduct it. 003, when the robot asked 003 to leave and was alone with 001 in the treatment room, it showed anger-003 was not there at the time, so there was no need for acting. It was really angry with 001, perhaps from then on completely. Lost feelings. Or maybe it only affects children who score up to the standard or who have not yet been polluted.
Regarding the test, who designed the test? Is it a robot? I don’t think it is. The person who designed the test questions should be the person who designed the robot, because it said that the test of 003 is also its test, testing its ability as a mother, and from the archives, the test is completed step by step, not Created on a whim. However, the 001 break-in test was designed by a robot, so there is a contradiction. Is the definition of excellence a designer's definition or a robot's definition? Who is responsible for hunting down the survivors?
Finally, back to the core question of the film, what kind of person is worth living? In the eyes of 001, those who are tortured by hunger and cannibalism in the mine are not worthy of being saved. 003 also thinks so after learning the truth, and in the eyes of robots, 001 is also not worthy of being saved, but In the eyes of 003, even the 001 debunked by a lie is still worth saving. Therefore, the robot has cultivated a human mother who is different from his own values, so how can a human mother cultivate a child exactly like himself?
In the final analysis, although the acquired influence is great, there is always a part of the bad roots that is imprinted in the genes.
And, for a species, are values important or survival important?
View more about I Am Mother reviews
