Entertainment education

Carleton 2021-12-12 08:01:16

The movie is good. It should be recommended to Ma Mao Mao, an expert on "American Press Freedom"-perhaps she has already seen it-and to people who are blindly envious of American freedom.
That was the day when McCarthyism was in power, the two camps were facing each other clearly, and the ideology could not be sloppy. Because the subtitles were too fast, HC couldn't lift the energy, so he took a nap and woke up in a trance, muttering "Isn't this show a focus interview". He really grasped the essence. The person to person program was trying to save the comfort-seeking TV audience from the vulgar program, and endowed it with social conscience, morality, and responsibility. This is a completely different goal demand. I wonder if Wang Zhi's "face-to-face" program was inspired by this?
This overreacting confrontation is also metaphorical for the United States today. The situation of the Middle Easterners after 9/11 was quite a bit of "subversion and danger" by the communists in the 1950s, and subjective identification, prejudice, and no trial are the most dangerous. This ideology is in the name of "protecting national interests." Instigation and seditiousness are beyond the reach of ordinary people. Among them, the media role of television cannot be ignored.
I like the black-and-white "tunes" of movies, with a sense of history-although a bit delicate; I also like the mellow and sexy voices of black female singers interspersed from time to time. The jazz has an extremely complex, deep velvet texture, and the decadence and night of the metropolis. The vitality, sin and beauty, the anxiety of the soul and the entertainment of the senses...that are also the different qualities and feelings that TV may bring to you.

View more about Good Night, and Good Luck. reviews

Extended Reading
  • Jennifer 2022-03-26 09:01:06

    Criticism of officials

  • Crawford 2022-03-25 09:01:09

    Green dollars for Jews, Gypsies, Gaddafi, Saddam

Good Night, and Good Luck. quotes

  • Edward R. Murrow: We will not walk in fear, one of another.

  • Edward R. Murrow: No one familiar with the history of this country, can deny that congressional committees are useful. It is necessary to investigate before legislating. But the line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one, and the Junior Senator from Wisconsin has stepped over it repeatedly. We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always, that accusation is not proof, and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men. Not from men who feared to write, to associate, to speak, and to defend the causes that were for the moment unpopular. This is no time for men who oppose Sen. McCarthy's methods to keep silent or for those who approve. We can deny our heritage and our history but we cannot escape responsibility for the result. We proclaim ourselves as indeed we are, the defenders of freedom wherever it continues to exist in the world. But we cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home. The actions of the Junior Senator from Wisconsin have caused alarm and dismay amongst our allies abroad and given considerable comfort to our enemies. And whose fault is that? Not really his, he didn't create this situation of fear, he merely exploited it, and rather successfully. Cassius was right, the fault dear Brutus is not in our stars, but in ourselves. Good night, and good luck.