I'm a big kid now, so I can't get a point to balance the score at every turn.
But this score is far from my psychological expectations. I know that rot TV shows generally have a higher score than its true level, but I did not expect it to be so much higher.
I can’t help asking, have you ever thought about the angel being set to be a female (and at the same time a charming male is set next to Crowley), what can you call her? Faced with such a situation, I hate my duty so I can’t complete it well. I want to obey my inner desire (to protect humans) but I resist it, because it is a “dirty work”. The first reaction when encountering danger is to point the sword at my own good. (Male) Friends, threaten him to come up with a solution right away, such a weak and confused female character, and at the same time occupy as many roles as Michael, what would you call it like? I will not scold such a male character, nor would I scold such a female character, but I know that such a character must have mixed reputation, and now everyone who calls "Sweetheart!" encounters the same attributes. Of women are likely to scold the most vicious words they can come up with.
I won't say that this is bound to come true, this is just an inference based on my previous experience of watching dramas. But the role of Michael, with all due respect, shows more human-oriented things like "cute", "food eaters" and "bookworms", without any positive promotion to the plot, and often shows up in the face of problems. For a help seeker who needs protection. This is not like a male lead in a double male lead drama, but more like a "female lead" in the past TV series to highlight the heroic "male lead". Nowadays, even dramas with male and female protagonists must try to portray the female protagonist as strong as possible. Even the seemingly weak female protagonist will have some shining points. However, the double male protagonist has given up this kind of confrontational relationship between the characters. Praise. It's also an act of confusing the world.
This is what I am most dissatisfied with, and other parts of it are far from "first-rate", at least far from the rating of "8.7". I will only mention a few points that I think are bad.
1. Change baby. In fact, when I first watched the first episode, I reported high expectations because of this three-baby exchange plot. The screenwriter used a series of coincidences to get the son of Satan out of the care of the demons and become the child of an ordinary family. Although for people like me who have seen too many routines, this is not a very brain-burning plot, but such inconsistent plot reminds me of some wonderful stories and confirms the level of screenwriting. And the scenes that intersect playing cards make me look forward to the director's skills.
But after seeing it, it was completely unnecessary to make such a complicated plot, because the camera only aimed at two children, and the third child was forgotten. In fact, another child besides Adam only got a few quick shots.
In other words, the exchange plot of the three families is dispensable. Turn the plot into: After the son of the devil was exchanged for a rich man's house by a silly nun, he was exchanged back by an unsuspecting old nun, and then the devil His son was adopted after the church collapsed without any problems. Set up as three families, except for the reason of showing off skills, I can't think of anything else.
2. During the boss battle, the participation of the protagonist group is basically the same as that of soy sauce. The three little bosses were actually killed by three children. What is this? Is it a children's drama? Of course, this play has a strong British humor. It is normal for this unexpected thing to appear (although it is not reasonable), but the three children did not show their corresponding beliefs. At first, I felt that girls have always had a humanist tendency, and I can understand their yearning for peace, but the other two did not show the tendency of environment lovers and food lovers at all.
Having said this, I was afraid of being slapped, so I took another look at the original drama and found this:
Not only is the girl not a pacifist, she also shows a tendency to violently solve everything in the previous lines. This makes the boss fight conflict with his character. Originally, the image of a few characters was not full, but now it is even more confusing. Moreover, several villains are stupid. The first reaction when people stabbing you is not to hide but to stop them.
I only watched this movie once, so I might not have noticed some of it. If anyone disagrees, you can tell me.
I don't hate this drama. I like British humor very much. Some plots are also very imaginative. I like rotten plots, but this one is too sweet and a bit greasy. The questions I ask are often not big ones, but they prevent me from kneeling and calling Dad. For me, it is just good at around 7 points, but I read it on the barrage website, and some people said that "this ending is very fascinating", and the mother who was sprayed didn’t know him, saying that Did not understand. I don't know what the level of people's movie watching has reached. Maybe all of them are professional film critics who graduated from Zhongchuan Beiying. We dare not say, we dare not ask.
View more about Good Omens reviews
