but it is true that the class has been in class for so long and no professor mentioned "Boston". "Boston Globe"
BG is a good newspaper. There is no doubt that
it has its problems. It used to pirate pictures of pornographic websites and claimed to be the result of US soldiers raping Iraqi women. Once published reports condemning the results of whaling by related persons in Norway. when the article was published in Norway weather over there who I have not yet begun to catch
these are events which had been criticized but compared to some reports NYT's be honest it has been a lot better
when it comes to this film had to start from the story
of this It reported a series of long reports from January 6, 2002 until December 14
last article entitled "the Pope accepted the resignation of Cardinal Law"
and the end of the film also said this Law monarch had so much to cover up the crime The pastor’s person was also promoted. Ironically
, NYT also followed up on this series of reports
. During Pope’s visit to New York, some survivors (referring to people who had experienced sexual assault but survived) also During the demonstration,
Pope also admitted this incident frankly and used the phrase "God weeps" (God weeps)
Of course, he did not admit it. This incident evolved into a global event after BG followed up. Canada and Australia and other places broke similar case took place in the same thing in Europe
obviously see it how much influence our hospital whom also awarded the Pulitzer Prize
, said the movie looked back so many movies in New York
Except that the Americans applaud the badly dressed films at the film festival (don’t check-in, if you have to, then we probably think the same). Usually, there are not many people applauding in movie theaters.
Bridge of Spies has a small group of people applauding, Suffragette has a small group of people applauding,
and this weekend file is almost full of 007, not to mention there are two applauses
once at the end of the feature film, and once at the end of the feature film, it
can be seen when the subtitles explain the follow-up development. The leftist-occupied New York is still quite supportive of the movie that criticizes this kind of church rule. How to watch this movie may be followed by more film critics.
When it comes to leftist and rightist sects, the most valuable thing about this movie is that it has almost no criticism. There is no tendency to compromise,
let alone one of them. One of the reporters found an obscene pastor who molested children and lived in his neighbourhood. He was wearing slippers and holding a pen and rushed out of the room to confirm that the pastor lived across two streets. When I got home, I posted "Children, be careful not to approach that weird crow" on the refrigerator
. On the night the newspaper was printed, he personally threw a newspaper at that wretched pastor (ah, we can call it a dark shepherd haha) At the door,
do you say that this movie has a standpoint? This scene illustrates just enough attitude director and the entire team of the
true church scandal is fear and mistrust brought about
would be reasonable that America is God's priest is the hand of God
pastor like the movie actually do nothing more than say some "bad apples" Chinese translation is called the black sheep of our political language or X is my very few
if superficially like the movie stopped at this group of perverted priest was uncovered group of reporters
that it is not worth not worth out of Rachel Performing so hard with Rufolo (especially him).
Fortunately, the director reads in-depth
the significance of this report is not at all that it takes a few pens to bring down the entire church,
not to mention how much Americans still trust, worship and follow the church
. Even if the church is broken to the bones, it is not as terrible as the unity of state and church in indulgences.
So if you want to point to the darkness of the entire church, the ten such movies are not enough.
But the most powerful thing about this movie is that it analyzes the true meaning of
this series of articles . This series of articles is like "Inception".
Wanting people to believe something is not to tell him bluntly or to imply silently,
but to plant a small point of view to let it take root.
This is Inception,
and this series of articles is an inception.
After that, Americans saw the believer or the priest. holding a child no longer tell the story first reaction is God bless to my children
but
quickly taken away my children
, of course believers all over the world or will the Catholic Christian believers of God throughout the system
but it will make the world a little inception media has been follow-up and then on to the church to regain the share of Protestant revolution at that time suspect
this is the best footnote to this series of articles
and its footnote film
is viewed from the outside to inside doors at the end of Mark Ruffalo movie
two injured children are happy to play with the blocks in the side of their mother about to look dignified conversation with the lawyer on this question
Mark's face was painful his mind must roll over those pictures as obscene and a whole generation of people worry about
just the Boston area alone 90 pastors were similar behavior
throughout the United States how much the whole Church there and how much cover
this scene most people moving is that it can not help but make people think
if there is a God
pastor nor angels nor archangels Pope
only child is The most beautiful angel in the world
This is why this report is so important, and the film uses almost a line drawing method to implant an idea into every American.
————————————————————————————————————————
Pastor changed to priest. Thank you netizen for your correction.
View more about Spotlight reviews
