After watching this movie last night, I was so moved that I didn't fall asleep for a long time. I came up with a review of the movie, which was really unexpected. "Character is flat. Mediocre. Tacky. Peaceful. It's too peaceful." Combining similar items is "ping." I'm not convinced. Although movie preferences are very personal matters, this slot is wrong and unfair. Guys, can you touch your conscience and tell me that after watching the movie, did you impress Hawking, Jane and Jonathan? Sisters, dare you pat your chest and tell me, what does "Taiping" mean? The production is well-made, the soundtrack is excellent, the photography is too beautiful, and the performance is in place. When did it become proof of "flatness"? Is it because the label of "commercial film" and "big production" denies that "Titanic" is a heinously great film? Some people say that it was filmed "too correct" and that it was tainted with the light of the subject matter, but if you look closely, is it a "politically correct" standardized assembly line movie? Absolutely not. God, before I watched it, I was worried that Hawking’s image was treated very inspirational and portrayed as a "disabled genius boy", but the screenwriter and director are so damn good. In addition to life, the Hawking in the film needs help. His friends and teachers did not treat him as a severely disabled person at all. Friends still joked, and teachers still ruthlessly pointed out the mistakes in his paper. One detail is: On the day of the doctor's defense, Hawking walked into the room with a cane and slowly moved to the teachers. The professor just casually asked, "Sit down?" Hawking said, no. Then they let him stand and began to comment on his graduation thesis. Disabled people actually hate that they are treated differently just because of their disability, and the whole life value has been denied. Many damn humans like to emphasize "Wow, you see that he is still running after a broken leg" instead of "He broke a leg or ran out 100 meters for 12 seconds"! In this film, people pay attention to "he has the highest achievement in studying the theory of the universe and wrote a brief history of time", rather than "he has a disability and still insists on studying physics." Only when people with disabilities are not treated as disabled, they are truly respected. The creators understand this deeply. After Jonathan appeared on the stage, it was really beautiful, and the three people lived a happy life. Jane had a secret feeling for him but didn't express it. Hawking even encouraged her to develop with Jonathan. When Jonathan left, he said, "Now, I should quit your life...because I feel for you." Jane hesitated and said, so do I. Jonathan said "thank you" and left. What a gentleman! The perfection of the three people is the most moving part of the film. When the nurse Elaine went beyond her authority to request, Jane did not try to kill their emotions in the bud, even though she could do it. Hawking tells Jane in an indirect way that Elaine has gradually taken her place in his life. He let go of Jane, and Jane also let go of his hand at the same time. Hawking smiled and asked Jane "How many years?" Jane red eyes: "They said you can only live for two years, but...you have been for many years." Then Jane made a final confession to Hawking "I have loved you" ,I did my best. The narration is not chaotic at all, showing the director's ability to control. The flashback at the end was particularly brilliant. Just as Hawking pushed back to the beginning of time, everything was being played back. He stood up in the wheelchair and went back to the dance party where he first met Jane, back to when they first saw each other. . Bowl. If you go back to the origin of time, will you still be there waiting for me? If these are still tacky and mediocre, what about the other films! There won’t really be people "Mei Ya" who think they are clichés when they see Oscar, right? As for whether it meets hawking's true relationship status, I don't care. For me, apart from documentaries, when the picture of a movie flashes on the screen, it is just a movie, and nothing else is involved. I don’t even care about whether it conforms to the original work or whether it conforms to historical facts. I only look at it from the perspective of watching movies, not news reports, not doctoral dissertations. Among the films I watched recently, this one is the only one worthy of review. Must be curious? Engage in base? British style? Those who sell cute, rot, and warmth, don’t even eat that. I hope that time can rectify the name of this excellent film and let it get the evaluation it deserves. I also hope that there will be more movies with my heart. I am waiting with a warm heart. The narration is not chaotic at all, showing the director's ability to control. The flashback at the end was particularly brilliant. Just as Hawking pushed back to the beginning of time, everything was being played back. He stood up in the wheelchair and went back to the dance party where he first met Jane, back to when they first saw each other. . Bowl. If you go back to the origin of time, will you still be there waiting for me? If these are still tacky and mediocre, what about the other films! There won’t really be people "Mei Ya" who think they are clichés when they see Oscar, right? As for whether it meets hawking's true relationship status, I don't care. For me, apart from documentaries, when the picture of a movie flashes on the screen, it is just a movie, and nothing else is involved. I don’t even care about whether it conforms to the original work or whether it conforms to historical facts. I only look at it from the perspective of watching movies, not news reports, not doctoral dissertations. Among the films I watched recently, this one is the only one worthy of review. Must be curious? Engage in base? British style? Those who sell cute, rot, and warmth, don’t even eat that. I hope that time can rectify the name of this excellent film and let it get the evaluation it deserves. I also hope that there will be more movies with my heart. I am waiting with a warm heart.
View more about The Theory of Everything reviews
