My rule of watching movies has always been "what you don’t understand is definitely a good movie." Like the previous "Memories" and "Mu Holland Road", I admit that I didn't understand them, but after looking for film reviews on the Internet and watching them, The initiation of talents generally understands the profound meaning of the movie. So as usual, I searched for film reviews after I didn't understand the movie, but I was surprised to find that the critics didn't seem to understand much better than me. Someone commented that the movie is about the six split personalities of the protagonist. First, the protagonist has a good and a bad personality, and then the bad personality splits into two masters, black and white, and the gang boss in the play is also the protagonist. One personality, but also split into two personalities, good and bad, so far six personalities have lived together. But I haven't understood yet, is there only one character in the whole play, the other characters are his personality split, the plot we are watching is his inner struggle? This explanation is too unreasonable, it seems that my guidelines are about to change.
In fact, what I am looking forward to is whether the director or screenwriter can come up with a statement. Even if you say that you don’t understand it, I can understand it. In the past, audiences were not fools. If you blindly pursue visual effects and pursuing the so-called deep meaning, then the dismal box office of the movie and the consistent criticism of the reviews are the evil results of your approach.
View more about Revolver reviews
