Most of the actors did a very good job, especially the two bimbos playing respectively the "villain" (or at least the bad person opposing the main protagonists – Bryce Dallas Howard) and the supportive role (Jessica Chastain). The two black women whose backstories are developed have also pulled of a good performance (Viola Davis, & Octavia Spencer who has won an Oscar). The main character (Ema Stone) however played her role without impressing very much and was clearly outshadowed by the others.
Some may disagree, but as I see it, the universe in which the story unfolds is a caricature of the real world. And this is not a negative critique at all. It just seems that the indoor settings (even the maids' houses) were too rich, too bright, too colourful. Except three characters (protagonist + 2 black maids), each and every character is a stereotype, a clichey of what they represent. The women are dressed in a flashy and vulgar way, they have pounds of make up on their face, they are constantly on high heels even at their own house, their hairstyle, their habits, their way walking & talking...etc. They did not seem as REAL people, behaving as if they are evolving in a normal and living world. They just seemed posing all the time and overplaying their role. Now once again don't get me wrong because I think that the result is really good. You can easily expect their behaviour and manners and concentrate on the other REAL characters, while enabling the writer to make an interesting point: the dumb people IRL with this type of personality & ideology are lacking depth and substance: they are mere tools, plot devices – denied from humanity and conscience. So in the end, these characters are almost just part of the setting itself. This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.You can easily expect their behaviour and manners and concentrate on the other REAL characters, while enabling the writer to make an interesting point: the dumb people IRL with this type of personality & ideology are lacking depth and substance: they are mere tools, plot devices – Denied from humanity and conscience. So in the end, these characters are almost just part of the setting itself. This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.You can easily expect their behaviour and manners and concentrate on the other REAL characters, while enabling the writer to make an interesting point: the dumb people IRL with this type of personality & ideology are lacking depth and substance: they are mere tools, plot devices – Denied from humanity and conscience. So in the end, these characters are almost just part of the setting itself. This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.the dumb people IRL with this type of personality & ideology are lacking depth and substance: they are mere tools, plot devices – denied from humanity and conscience. So in the end, these characters are almost just part of the setting itself. This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.the dumb people IRL with this type of personality & ideology are lacking depth and substance: they are mere tools, plot devices – denied from humanity and conscience. So in the end, these characters are almost just part of the setting itself. This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.This type of setting is fitting very well the idea of a remote & isolated place, a sort of sub-world outside the world's tendancies and evolution. Martin Luther King only belongs on a TV that gets turned off right away by the masters. History goes on, but only outside of this bubble – before getting smashed by protagonist.
The tone of the movie, though the subject is quite serious, leans more towards the comedy rather than the drama. The movie is funny: the delicious pie which main ingredient is shit is certainly the most memorable joke, along with a couple of others ( WC at the garden; the fried chicken etc.). But the more serious tones were from time to time played, mainly in order to pinpoint white people's cruelty towards the black (how the protagonist's maid was fired, the false accusations of theft, the firings...etc.).
As far as I could tell, the music was nothing special, and rather discrete, going with the flow.
Overall it's a nice, light movie. At the same entertaining and educative.
View more about The Help reviews
