name of the decoy film for the vendetta party is "Kind Gold", and the proportion of the footage and plot of the film is indeed not digressing. It faithfully revolves around gold: gold goes to jail --> gold cultivates relationships in prison (this reminds me Our party members and cadres went to the party school), killing the perverted "witch" who cannibalized people-->Finding the daughter who was taken away by the enemy-->Finding the enemy-->Planning and successfully organizing a cold mass murder party--> Eat snow and tofu with your daughter and lover to wash away your sins.
Such a simple storyline, in the hands of Director Park, really shines like Lee Jin-jin while serving his sentence. The film has killings and (maternal) love; sins and innocences; perverted personality and rational behavior; friendly angelic smiles (with interesting details and colorful sub-shots), and quiet and insidious ( The theme of revenge, bloody methods, and the gloom of human nature). Sorry, I accidentally used the words on the line: human nature, gloomy. But in my opinion, the purpose of the film is indeed to talk about human nature and darkness; and our "kind" beauty Li Jinzi is just a medicine, a clue, and a bait. The screenwriter uses her beauty, misfortune, and innocence. , Perfection, hatred, scheming and motherhood seduces the audience, and slowly enters the climax of the film: the feast of revenge.
So, let's start with the bait Li Jinzi. The beautiful girl became an unmarried mother when she was 18 years old. When she was 19 years old, she became an accomplice in a kidnapping case and an accomplice of a kidnapper. The screenwriter played a black humor here, and the mastermind of the case, Mr. Bai, kidnapped her daughter. , Intimidating her as a scapegoat. One kidnapper kidnapped another kidnapper's child, and the screenwriter was ruthless. Li Jinjin acted as a scapegoat, staying in prison for 13 years, during which she spent 3 years using bleach to kill the prison tyrant, and spent the rest of her time helping other inmates to gain their trust and return-for her Revenge in the future helps. The women’s prison in the film is set up like a kindergarten, and the colors of the lens are quite warm. Except for the prison tyrant who was poisoned to death by gold, every female prisoner is gentle and cute. The faults that caused them to go to jail are insignificant. Their innocent nature (I would like to admire the human right situation in Korea by the way). The life of these women prisoners after they are released is no different from those of people who have not been in prison. Some of them are even better than women who have never been in prison. This may be incomprehensible to us Chinese: people who have been in the classroom Can it be so smoothly accepted by society?
In stark contrast to these female prisoners are the parents who later attended the revenge party. Since the plot does not involve the past of these parents, we temporarily think that they are all good citizens who are innocent and innocent like tofu before participating in the revenge party. With the assistance of Li Jinzi, her inmates, and Inspector Su, they suddenly got the opportunity to avenge their children who died. At this moment, the perverted murderous teacher Bai has been tightly tied to a chair by Li Jinzi, with dirty fillings in his mouth, and two toes have been knocked off by Jin Jin's gorgeous pistol; parents who lost their children are sitting In a classroom next door, after watching the video of Teacher Bai killing their children, angry flames burned, and they wanted to torture their common enemy Teacher Bai to death. But Li Jinzi and Inspector Su really offered the opportunity they longed for. When they chose, they quarreled and gave way to each other. Some people say that they need to be handled by the police, some people say that they need to entrust an experienced gold disposal, and some people say that they have to deal with this perverted guy by their own hands. After unifying their opinions and deciding to personally execute the perverted teacher, they are still worried: Everyone is better together, or should they retaliate individually? The perverted teacher is their common enemy, but some parents think it is a personal grievance to some extent. In the end they decided to combine freely, wanting to go it alone, wanting to commit an accomplice. So, there must be a first-come-first-served order, right? Finally, the parents draw lots to obtain admission tickets to the murder. They were tit-for-tat, and their opinions from moment to moment were transmitted to the ears of the perverted teacher by the microphone, which dispelled the soul of this perverted man who was psychologically distorted and had been tortured by gold. In this clip, the timidity and mutual distrust of the good citizens are expressed through various trivial questions, and this triviality, together with the bloody scenes that follow, appears to be both real and absurd.
Revenge is about to begin. Parents wear raincoats (so as not to catch the blood of abnormal teachers), line up on the benches in the order of admission, in an orderly manner, and even pull each other home. This is reminiscent of the nursery rhyme of "sit in rows and eat fruit", or the patients waiting in the hospital. They are waiting to be executed, but they are more like waiting to be slaughtered. As a civil servant in South Korea, Inspector Su did a so-called malfeasance: teach these avengers how to stab people with a knife. They entered the scene of the vendetta individually or in groups, and then came out individually or in groups, stained with blood, and even slipped because of the blood on the floor. The grandmother of a child seemed calm, but he fiercely inserted a pair of scissors in the neck of the abnormal teacher. The scissors merged with the abnormal teacher like a clockwork, turning him into a corpse. When Inspector Su pulled out the scissors from the corpse, I was really worried that the director would have a horror film complex, making the corpse move mechanically like a clockwork toy. The scissors quietly separated from the corpse, dripping blood in accordance with common sense. Immediately, as soon as the camera switched, the parents began to clean up the scene of the vendetta, pouring blood, mopping the floor, mopping the floor, and lifting the corpse. It is really a high firewood for everyone, and the division of labor and cooperation is very reasonable. The vendetta scene is quickly cleaned up. . Everything seemed to have never happened. The parents' original anger, hatred, and pleasure of venting immediately disappeared from their faces, faster than a puddle of water on the side of the road evaporates. Sure enough, everything is difficult at the beginning. At first they couldn't adapt to the reality of getting a chance for a vendetta, but once the vendetta started, it ended so easily. In order to prevent accomplices from betraying themselves in the future, they took a group photo together, and the smell of blood must still be strong at the scene. Now, with a group photo, no one will be betrayed. The enemies who are angry with man and god have been buried, along with their anger, worry and sin. It's that simple to end the life of a person, a pervert with hatred. Next, they came to a celebration banquet, sitting around the table in the bakery, tasting delicious pastries made of family gold, singing birthday songs, discussing the trance passing angels, and then writing down their account numbers so that Please Li Jinzi to return the ransom paid to the perverted teacher in the future. This episode inevitably reminds me of two words: divide the spoils. The director arranged this detail, what is the intention? Deliberately reminiscent of these two nasty words?
This revenge party opened a small gap, from which we can see how strong a person's revenge instinct is, so strong that it can kill a person without hesitation. Should this person be killed, should they be killed, and how should they be killed? Everyone has their own answers. Is there a standard answer? If so, should it be determined by the law? The law may represent the opinions of the majority of people in society, but it does not necessarily represent the opinions of the parties, or the parties will not solve the criminals themselves. If the law cannot represent the opinions of the parties, but only the opinions of an irrelevant majority, what use is it? The law is often just an afterthought. These murdered parents did kill people, but no one sent them to jail. If they were good citizens innocently, maybe they would think of the vendetta in the future, but as time goes by, they will come more and more. The more indifferent. Li Jinzi was forced to become an accomplice in kidnapping children and was detained for 13 years. The children were also taken away. Her inmates also made atonement in jail for various minor mistakes (compared to the murderous acts of revenge) and paid the price. What does this phenomenon tell us? What I think of is: first, if you accidentally commit a crime, don't get caught for a while; second, the more accomplices, the safer you are.
Look, this vendetta party is more like a tip for exoneration.
View more about Lady Vengeance reviews
