There is not much to say about the plot. I believe you can guess that the defendant will lose in the end, regardless of the reason. The biggest point of the film is the mode of operation of the entire jury in the case. Although the teacher will also mention what the Anglo-American jury chooses in class, it is not as clear as such an intuitive film (of course, I don’t know how it works. How true is it, at least procedurally.) At the beginning, I just know that it is very important for a common law lawyer to know how to select the jury members (this is also an instruction from watching a movie, "The Devil's Spokesperson":)) After watching this film, I realized that there is still such a thing as a jury consultant.
Basically, it is to see how the hero and heroine compete with the defendant’s jury consultant, how to cleverly be selected into the jury list, how to capture traces to influence the direction of the entire jury’s discussion process, and how to make others think that you have the ability to control the entire jury. The jury, etc., etc., very interesting. Thinking of those court dramas of tvb, the story itself may not be so great, but it is eye-catching when viewed in court.
View more about Runaway Jury reviews
