I overestimated the heroine. At first, I thought that the method and judgment of the heroine would not be so naive (she had sex with the criminal under such a big loophole?) fuck, the criminals are the least before the heroine and the criminal go to bed I have made a mistake 7 times (and this is only in the eyes of ordinary people)
1. The heroine already knows that every time the criminal kills, he uses the routine of blaming the dead and pretending to be another dead person. When the criminal acted as a painter, it was enough to arouse the heroine's suspicion, but he actually excluded the painter easily, let alone It's the FBI, even normal policemen would highly doubt this painter
2. When the painter and the man who sold the paintings drove away together, the man who was carrying the pot was dead and left the world in a disfigured manner. A normal person actually dared to take a gun while showing that the deceased had no ability to resist. If the gun is fired several times in a row, the response of a normal person should be to leave the car and run to the distance or to the police as soon as possible. People with better psychological quality will most likely seize the gun and run away, but they will definitely not lose it continuously. People with the ability to resist fired several shots in a row. This should not be something that a senior FBI agent cannot detect.
3. When the police were deceived by criminals and adopted daily tracking to protect criminals, new cases never happened again. It wouldn't be such a coincidence. I naively thought that the criminals found were criminals, and did not use the thoughts of the previous heroine herself. The criminal commits the crime by blaming others for him.
4. When the mother and the coroner confirmed that both the criminal’s mother and the coroner had confirmed that his son was not really dead, she already knew the criminal’s routine and did not allow the mother to personally identify the photos of all relevant personnel in the recent case, including the police. Or any suspicious person (police usually also possible), if the mother sees the photo earlier, it is far from the result, it seems plot and not rigorous
5. When the hostess went to the criminal's house for the second time (in fact, at this time, he was at least 60% sure that the mother's son was the suspect), and she came to the criminal's house alone to search for evidence. Got caught, and the heroine is not very good at close combat
6. It is also what I don’t understand. When the mother went to the hospital to identify the corpse, the mother made a non-human reaction, that is, it did not indicate that the corpse belonged to his son, nor did it indicate that it was not his son. The person walked into the elevator (there was no police protection, and several other people present, including the hostess, did not immediately follow up) and did not jump off the elevator when they caught up. If the elevator was forced to open the first floor, the height would only be the first floor. Gao, do you have any criminals with guns? You are a professionally trained FBI. You don't jump to save your mother. At the same time, what is even more outrageous is that the criminals left the hospital after killing someone? omg, is it the first time to chase the criminal out to the train station, it must be driven by car? At this time, while chasing, notifying the other police to close the road is too late
7. The point that irritated me the most was that at the end, an FBI agent did not have an escort when he arranged to kill criminals (although you are the FBI, the heroine’s close combat is really bad), such as in a nearby house. Long-term squatting, and the weapons are placed in the refrigerator under the table, where ordinary people can guess. This criminal has definitely visited the hostess’s house more than once. He watched the hostess’s belly grow up day by day. She has spied on the heroine many times, as the FBI, and coordinated the layout with the police force (when the end of the film gave a report to the person in charge, it was proved that this layout was not done by her alone). Didn't she discover and catch the criminal in advance? ? Just look at the female host’s belly according to the month of pregnancy. The criminal has followed the female host at least 10 times and 8 times, but he didn’t find it?
Do you know why I gave 1 star? That's because Julie is there. Otherwise, I will give 0 stars directly to this movie. This FBI is not as good as an ordinary person. Compared with the agent Sauter played by Julie, there is a difference of 100,000 Baqianli, although it is a special agent, it is positioned half a level higher than the FBI, but its handling methods and psychological qualities are extremely different.
View more about Taking Lives reviews
