Although I watched this movie for the little freckles playing Hawking at first, after watching it, I have to admit that the protagonist of this film is Jane Hawking. After reading other film reviews, I realized that this is based on Jane's memoirs. No wonder there is more ink in Jane's psychological activities. In the first half of the story, the two people met and fell in love until they got married were not very convincing to me: it was reasonable for Stephen to fall in love with Jane. She is so beautiful and innocent. Conversely, it is difficult to convince me where Jane was attracted by Stephen. The audience of course understand that no matter what, the beautiful girl can easily be crushed by IQ in front of the genius Hawking, but they always feel that the clips given by the director are not enough to make people dizzy. After Jiudaoqin was calmed down, he should fall in love with him with both eyes.
The description of life after marriage is much more vivid and detailed. Considering that this is Jane’s memory, people can’t help but feel that in Jane’s memory, the memory after marriage, whether staying together or crying bitterly, is more than the good memory during love. Much. From the very beginning, the newly married life that I cherished with the expectation of a two-year life expectancy, the birth of two children, and the academic success of Hawking (I like Jane secretly sitting in the back row listening, nervous and overwhelmed while learning from other professors (Details of holding hands on chin), if Hawking died at this time, it would be like the ending of the Titanic, a tragic song. Fortunately, he did not die, but unfortunately he did not die, he just slowly withered. The little freckles here simply illuminates the universe, from a vigorous teenager to a role that is tied up by illness, and only relies on expressions and eyes to convey emotions. His performance is so perfect that I don’t remember little freckles after watching half of it. What should it look like. Although Jane’s role is not as challenging at a glance as when she is playing Yan Renren, she also has more room to play. When caring for the children and husband, she was like a wife and a mother, taking care of the whole family. When being disturbed by chores and unable to learn, when crying alone in the woods, when driving down and feeling guilty after a crash, this role is complicated, and the actors have interpreted every angle in place. The audience understands that love and admiration will be consumed in painful trivial matters. This is already the case in ordinary people's lives. In the life of "we are not a normal family", it will only torture people faster and more.
The part of the story until Jonathan appeared on the scene has already made me feel uncomfortable. Thanks to the actor's superb acting skills for making me so into the play. In this episode of the plot, there is a feeling of showing me the wound. Even if I haven't heard of Hawking's marriage gossip, I still feel panicked when watching him play with his wife and children. There is nowhere to express this kind of discomfort, obviously it is the visible affection and ambiguity, but we can't blame Jane or Stephen, or even Jonathan, who blended in but was in esteem. In response to the audience’s discomfort and relatives (and the audience’s) doubts, Jane used her memoirs and movies to emphasize that the child is Stephen’s, and it was her decisive and resolute request for rescue at Stephen’s life to avoid the huge loss of the scientific community. . Even in the most ambiguous camping session between her and Jonathan (I don't know if the movie implies that they both slept), she persisted in saving Stephen's disabled life.
The two biggest tears were Stephen, who had lost his voice, sitting by the window. The doctor once told him that the brain is not affected, but one day people will not know what you are thinking. He was never desperate because of muscle disorders, but a scientist with the universe in his mind would really panic if he couldn't express his thoughts. And Jane found a stupid way. I will never forget her trembling hands holding the spelling board and her firm tears. In another place until the very end, she said, "I loved you, I tried my best." Stephen and I both cried. "The doctor said that for two years, we have had so many years." It's lucky to live so many years, but it's hard to suffer for so many years.
The last segment that moved me was that when someone asked about the philosophy of Hawking's life, his mind imagined that he stood up and picked up a pen. When the lens returned to reality, he said:
"Obviously we are just an advanced species of primate, living on a very small planet, and it is orbiting a very ordinary star. On its outer edge, it is just One of the trillions of galaxies. But since the birth of human civilization, mankind has been eager to understand the underlying natural laws of the world. There should be something special about the boundary of the universe. Is there anything more special than no boundary. Human beings. There should be no boundaries to our efforts. We are very different. No matter how bad life looks, there is always something you can do and succeed. Where there is life, there is hope."
The love story I generally look forward to is about love. It's the ending, whether it's death or happy ever after. However, the love in a biographical movie, or a biography of a love, has a beginning and an end: when you love, you don't care about life and death, and you let go after love. This may be a certain version of life than a ballad.
View more about The Theory of Everything reviews
