Plot in inner time consciousness

Derrick 2022-01-01 08:02:07

Why is it called "internal time awareness"? In fact, it is very improper to put this term here. After studying it, I have become a sinner and juggler of phenomenology.
But it does not exist in "waking life"—even if it exists, it is cleverly concealed—normal time. The protagonist has been wandering, and the picture has been wandering. The audience is lured into the trap of language texture: only language, a huge and seemingly chaotic large monologue, can be grasped by the audience-even if it is messy, it does not break away from the grammar , And in the plot and picture, we can even say that the whole film is a fragmented conjecture. Is this the director's malice or purpose?
Perhaps the director also hopes that the audience will give up the plot and devote all their energy to Zhuang Zhidie's Zen machine. He doesn’t have this need at all. People who are willing to spend time watching the film twice or three times don’t care about the bullshit plot at all. Such people are paranoid, otherwise they would rather find a tango record and listen to it (by the way, The background music is appropriately selected tango that can highlight fatigue, tension, worry and trying to grasp a trace of rational emotions, which is great).

View more about Waking Life reviews

Extended Reading

Waking Life quotes

  • Man on TV: A single ego is an absurdly narrow vantage from which to view this experience. And where most consider their individual relationship to the universe, I contemplate relationships of my various selves to one another.

  • Kim Krizan: Creation seems to come out of imperfection. It seems to come out of a striving and a frustration and this is where I think language came from. I mean, it came from our desire to transcend our isolation and have some sort of connection with one another. And it had to be easy when it was just simple survival. Like you know, "water." We came up with a sound for that. Or saber tooth tiger right behind you. We came up with a sound for that. But when it gets really interesting I think is when we use that same system of symbols to communicate all the abstract and intangible things that we're experiencing. What is like... frustration? Or what is anger or love? When I say love, the sound comes out of my mouth and it hits the other person's ear, travels through this byzantine conduit in their brain through their memories of love or lack of love, and they register what I'm saying and they say yes, they understand. But how do I know they understand? Because words are inert. They're just symbols. They're dead, you know? And so much of our experience is intangible. So much of what we perceive cannot be expressed. It's unspeakable. And yet you know, when we communicate with one another and we feel that we have connected and we think that we're understood I think we have a feeling of almost spiritual communion. And that feeling might be transient, but I think it's what we live for.