This is the most complicated movie of the year. The departure of the Iranian husband, my guess is that the feeling of returning to the hometown and cultural soil (as can be seen from the Persian dialogue between the coffee shop owner and him), and the wife did not let him explain, because, to no avail, this is human The things in the blood cannot be changed. The relationship between the two of them was not separated because there was no love or a third party. Judging from the relationship between him and his children, this marriage is worthy of recognition. Moreover, he did not come to sign the divorce papers last year, perhaps it is hidden (do not want to end); and her "derailment", perhaps as the lover (laundry owner) said, because "make up for the misfortune of marriage", the two stores (and the pharmacy) ) Being very close, it is often in love over time. And she refused to let her ex-husband stay in the hotel, and told him the fact of pregnancy at the last moment, probably because of "retaliation", and retaliation is the inability to let go, and the inability to let go is "there is no end." Her pain was caused by him, so he Silence, sadness and weakness. This extramarital affair, when both parties do not know the truth-whether his wife knows the truth, the relationship between the two is also fragile. The child is an accident, which means that their relationship has to move forward because of the child. Interestingly, no, it should be said that the entanglement is that his wife felt betrayed by a woman's instinct, but looked in the wrong direction. She may not have read those letters, but she committed suicide and the truth has not been revealed. How do people face their own desires. If falling in love is a bigger matter, does it mean that you can ignore the pain of a third party? The eldest daughter and the laundry staff are both “outsiders” and people who have immediate interests with the parties involved in the incident (mother and daughter and the employer). In fact, they are not involved in the core of the incident. Regardless of the truth or misunderstanding, they are The shopkeeper’s suicide was not responsible, but she didn’t just stand by, but they were all harmed (by someone close to them, being driven away). This is a weirdness of human nature. The person who hits the other person is responsible for the tragedy. But blame the person who told the truth. The past, is it past? When his wife shed tears when she smelled his perfume, I also cried. Love is deep in consciousness, even if the body "dies."
View more about The Past reviews
