I was pleasantly surprised to see Ron Pullman, the lovely "Hellboy" uncle, and Claire Franny, co-starring with the handsome guy Brad Pitt and the old man Anthony Hopkins. "The Sixth Sense of Life and Death" touched many people, but for some reason, there was no good thing to do after that, and it is actually mixed in these films. It is really good fortune to make people.
You can say that this is a big bad movie, but the factors covered in the plot include magic, war, love, court coup, and beautiful European scenery. In addition, in terms of the relationship between the characters in the play, It involves wizards, warcraft people, humans, as well as warriors with good archery skills and races flying around in the jungle. These factors combined together can form the framework of "Lord of the Rings", which is enough to combine into a good-looking The scene of a blockbuster. But this film is full of crude and random production. The beast soldiers put on a simple headgear and slashed. The wizard's mana also looked like a child's play, and it was almost impossible to see that this was a magical movie.
As for the plot, a little farmer takes on the important task of saving his homeland. This looks a lot like "Brave Heart", but at first glance, it doesn't match the number at all, and the little farmer here has become the king's legacy. The son in the folks seems too spoof and too unreal.
Such a film is really not enough to introduce China. It is necessary to know that China's quota for foreign films imported is only 20 per year. Choosing such a film to fool the market is really sorry for the audience. In fact, there are so many excellent foreign films every year, but why not introduce them, but such films. If you don’t think about it with a vicious heart, it probably reflects the personal preference of the comrades who are responsible for the introduction of the SARFT. Maybe they like to watch it. Otherwise, why the bald Jason Statham and the bad film director Uvi Bao Your films can be imported continuously. Jason Statham's "Chaotic War" was introduced not long ago, and Uvi Bauer's "Lonely Hero" was also introduced last year. They all proved to be bad movies, but why were they falsified? After that, do you still have to introduce it again and again? This kind of thinking is really unintelligible. According to our country's national conditions, we can only suspect that the person responsible for the introduction has taken the rebate, or they really like it. If you take the rebate, it's better to say that it is short of manpower and not bringing in the bribes is not enough to return the bribes. If they really like it, wouldn't they use their personal love to rape other people's horizons? Living in a non-democratic society, from this point of view, is really a kind of sadness, because there is a grievance, but there is no object to fight back, and I can only guess alone, sad.
However, to put it bluntly, I still insisted on watching this film, and Jason Statham's skill in the film is not as good as his performance in modern films. As for Ron Pullman and Claire Franny, I'm sorry, but unfortunately you are mixing here. It seems that between the second-rate and the third-rate, you will continue to wander about. After reading it, I can only say that the memory will be quickly forgotten consciously, sorry.
View more about In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale reviews
