First of all, artificial intelligence is bound to develop day by day, but in which direction does it go out and in what form? We don't know. The play believes that in the end, robots are required to do things, and people are responsible for directing, alas, all kinds of fragility, flesh, and will. Humans need robots to block bullets, do heavy work, retrieve information, etc. We default to what machines should do. What's even more shameful is that humans also need sex robots to comfort loneliness! It's crazy! From this point of view, human beings are useless, and I don’t know why robots have not replaced them! In another episode of the same period, artificial intelligence thinks that it may be connected to the chip in the brain to expand our memory and computing speed, and can be directly connected to the Internet, then we have an infinite database. I (hehe, okay, no professionalism, just a personal opinion) think this is more realistic. My friend scientist (hosting a new drug laboratory) said that I don’t understand chips, but since the heart stent can be realized, in time, find an access point in a certain nerve in the brain and use bioelectric current to control the chip. I think it’s not impossible. . At the same time, scientists think that it is more feasible to use external forces (such as drugs) to vigorously develop the brain's potential. Originally, our brains are only a little bit (sorry, he said the specific data, but I forgot). However, this thing cannot be done independently, because in fact, all kinds of stimulants today also have this function, and the sequelae are serious because our physical energy cannot be supplied. At that time, we were very hi and could do what we can't normally do, but, At the price of overdraft. Therefore, if you want to use this method to improve, then it must be an evolutionary development. Energy consumption must be reduced, the energy consumption of the human body. (Well, this one has nothing to do with artificial intelligence. I just talked to scientists and found it interesting. I must write it down.)
Then, given my profession, many years ago, when I planned to change my career, the master said: Why do you want To do a job destined to be replaced by Google? I thought hard for a week, wishing I could not get rid of it overnight, and finally concluded: retrieval is easier and easier, but customization will become more and more expensive, and the work of communication will never be replaced by machines.
In AH, I found that the police station did not even have a forensic doctor. The engineer was responsible for repairing the robot's hardware and solving the virus upgrade system, and he was able to dissect the corpse! ! !
Then the more and more thoughts became in the chaos.
If big data achieves exhaustion (we don’t consider how difficult it is and how much storage space is needed), there are indeed countless things that can be left to the machine, because as long as there is comprehensive data, it will make statistical decisions and execute them. NS. So, what do people do? (Look at my hard work, right? I'm still worried that people will be bored with nothing.) Big data can only support things that have already existed and can be counted. Then, in the end, what is left of man can only create, art, culture, technological invention, and innovation. Damn, from now on we must seriously cultivate the habit of thinking. After a few generations, this will become a genetic gene to ensure that our offspring will not be eliminated in the era of artificial intelligence! (This concern is laughed by scientists, but they also agree with the way that genes are cultivated. Haha, unfortunately, it will take many, many generations.)
Traditionally, I think the most difficult professions are doctors and lawyers, both of which require years of study, basically The best grades among our classmates, and then the most relevant talents, will take years of hard work to do well. So what about artificial intelligence?
Scientists say that it will not be so, because the most important thing for doctors is judgment. In fact, there are successful cases on both sides of a judgment. Even if the machine can be exhaustive, if the probability of success is fifty to fifty, the machine will not crash? Moreover, experience is too complicated, and countless factors cause it to be too demanding for algorithm setting personnel, and it is basically impossible to imagine that it can be done.
So, finally let me put down my worries about lawyers, because, in fact, the first time I thought, if we can exhaustively, then the law of the sea system will go bankrupt. They are case law, and the machine can store all the cases and contradict each other. There are so many, how do you judge this?
Good risk, good risk, no matter what, we won’t see it in our lifetime, hahaha
View more about Almost Human reviews
