Sorry actually why I took out the title that pretended to be X, but I’ve actually been mentally disabled by Turnip’s Yan Zhen, ah, I’m talking about it. "Detective Sherlock Holmes 2", please hurry up and watch this movie, whether you just want to watch a good story or want a beauty that cannot be changed by time or &(()())__*()) you know , In this movie will be strongly satisfied.
Many comments say that this movie is far from the original, but if you really look at the original, you will find that Ge Dao definitely read through the original very deeply, because in this movie, you can’t see the original. The old-fashioned copy, but there are countless details that cleverly use the content of the original book. Especially the scene of jumping off the cliff in the second part, I think the setting of the movie perfectly reproduces the situation in the original book (and even when the whole story is different from the original book, it still retains the most classic bridge in the original book. part). And let Watson witness Holmes falling off the cliff, more than the original book, he learned more about the deep friendship between the two people.
Compared with those well-regulated film adaptations, the Sherlock Holmes series (in fact, I can’t help but want to be GAY guide every time I play the cover guide)’s Sherlock Holmes series is more like a perfect fan, retaining the main characters and main characters of the original book. The relationship between the characters and the details of the original work are restored, and at the same time, the characters' personalities are imaginatively deepened. Watson in the original book is more loyal to and following Holmes, and although Jude Law's Watson is also loyal, followed, and is also fully understood by Holmes and then mastered, Watson and Holmes in the movie , More like a cooperative partner. Watson in the original book follows Holmes out of total worship of Holmes, and Watson in the movie is not so much a follower as he is needed-he is strongly needed by Sherlock Holmes. This need was so strong that Holmes even blamed Watson for his temporary disadvantage in the contest with Moriarty. Holmes in the original book is equally arrogant, super IQ, taking drugs, playing the violin, and boxing. Watson is his only friend. Only by solving the case can make him feel alive. These points have not changed. But Carrot gave his Holmes more cute, jerk, and human details. He even made his Holmes appear fragile-fragility that makes mistakes, not everything is under control. These details make his transcendence in solving the case no longer so deified. Let his Holmes no longer be looked up to.
In addition, regarding Moriarty, although he is described as the strongest opponent of Holmes in the original work, in fact Moriarty was deliberately created by Conan Doyle not to continue the series of "Holmes", although he repeatedly exaggerated his Ingenuity and so on, but in fact, there is no specific positive description of Moriarty's crime in the original book. The film developed a detailed and convincing development of this point, including the content, purpose, and methods of Mogliari’s crimes, adding specific content, and it also fits the situation in Europe after the Industrial Revolution and before the First World War. . And details such as his love for Schubert's music also make this person's ruthless, selfish, and perverted more three-dimensional. This perversion was brought to an extreme when he sang "Sturgeon" while torturing Holmes.
Regarding Holmes's brother, I don't think I can find an actor who is more worthy of this role than Uncle FRY. He is tall, slightly bloated, but full of wisdom, which is exactly the same as the original description. Uncle FRY's unique humor and nonchalant are more appropriate benefits.
The best part of the film's development is still the relationship between Holmes and Watson.
In the original work, Holmes once said to Watson that although you cannot shine, you are a conductor of light. In the original work, Watson is the witness and recorder of Holmes's case. People understand Holmes through Watson's eyes. It is because of Watson's appreciation of Holmes that he has the smartest Holmes in the world. In the movie, Watson's adoration of Holmes is weakened and replaced by the tacit cooperation of the two. Whether it's Holmes in the jungle giving a good bullet to Watson to shoot, or Watson in the cellar cutting the sandbags, or the task of each going to their own at the end, or the perfect cross between Holmes's interpretation and Watson's implementation during reasoning. Holmes was not by Watson's side, but every word Holmes said, Watson could fully understand and turn it into his own reasoning. In the original work, Watson is often the foil for Holmes' high IQ. It is often Watson who gives a wrong reasoning, and then Holmes leisurely points out the fallacy of Watson's reasoning. In the movie, Holmes never reflects his superiority in IQ in such a place. He only manifested in one place, and that was when he was going to tease Watson. Deliberately jumped off the cliff in front of him and sent back a respirator. He surprised Watson in this way. He was sure that Watson would understand when he saw the respirator. If he only reappears without accident, he is not Holmes. And there is no need for redundant explanations between them. This is tacit understanding. It is based on mutual understanding of each other. Such friendship. It cannot bring family happiness, it does not have the sweetness of muffins, or the warmth of a scarf. Without this friendship, life remains as usual. However, just like Watson's frozen expression when she witnessed Holmes's fall from the cliff, a part of Watson's life also froze with it. Perhaps only Watson would know what else the rushing waterfall took away except for the life of Holmes.
When I met you, I was alone.
Obviously such a sad tone. Obviously weird and lame retired soldiers who are not accepted by the world, but because of each other's encounter, they have sparked brilliant sparks. This is not the story of light and the conductor of light, but the story of two objects rubbing together to create fire. This kind of relationship between characters is developed by the guide himself. It merges with the whole story, complements each other, is cause and effect, and is not far-fetched.
Some people say that this movie is rotten, but I just want to tell those people that in addition to the love of men and women, there are deeper feelings than falling in love and forming a family in this world. It's just that you can't see it.
View more about Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows reviews
