God, you created me, but you can’t ask me to obey your rules unconditionally. (1) Nowadays, there are many kinds of computer network magazines on the market, and they are basically used to include CD-ROMs. Most of the CDs are shared software, small games, interesting and interesting articles and pictures on the Internet, and so on. But many people don't care about these. If you ask why it can only show that you are not from this era, or it is a pity, you may just live in a barren western region abandoned by our era-you are not a modern urbanite! The Internet seems to be awakened by us and does not know where it will lead us into a mysterious body. Perhaps, he has taken us to the far, far future. Sooner or later, it will eventually be out of our control. As I said in "Mechanical Enemy" which I have watched three times, robots are made, but sooner or later they will have some thoughts, matter or other things beyond our control. The movie said that they might still dream. However, at present, this kind of future is still far away from us. Because at least until now, I have not found some information on the Internet, so that my bad memory can not recall the name of the software that I want to say is not new, but can make me tremble as soon as I think about it. Today’s young people on the Internet don’t know that around 1996, there was a magazine called "Software". Compared with the "Popular Software" that later became famous, this was a journal that had the idea of big media. First of all, this "Software" was the first to come with a free CD-when the CD-ROM configuration rate of personal computers was less than half at that time, this made me a luxury person happy for a long time. Secondly, in 1996 or 1997, "Software" interviewed a person and asked him to do the cover of the current issue. At that time, this person was cute and miniature, with pimple face. The photo shows him doing the sport he still likes to show after ten years in Tiananmen Square—skateboarding. Yes, his name is Zhang Chaoyang. He had just returned to China, and his idea of starting a business in the future was not so clear. However, "Software" took a very long time to tell the story of this returnee. However, these are not what reminds me of "Software". In 1997, after buying three consecutive issues of "Software", I was shocked by the software provided by one of the free CDs. This issue of the magazine comes with several similar softwares, produced by programmers in various laboratories around the world. Each piece of software is very small, and even my 420M hard drive has not noticed any attachment when it is installed. Up to now, I have forgotten the names of those software, but the editor said when introducing: This is a software with life! (2) Humans invented computers and invented programming. So the computer faithfully executes various programming commands. Even our amazing games and all kinds of highly interactive software are just responding as set by programming. Although Microsoft continues to say that the artificial intelligence in the software it creates can slowly learn by itself, this is the same as the so-called smart input method we use. The adjustment of word frequency and phrase memory are all set. "Software with life" is different. The designers who designed them also have no way of knowing how they will develop next-because they have their own stress response. Please forgive my indiscriminate use of words and confusing introduction. You know, how can a liberal arts student who has no basic knowledge in science, the most incompletely remembered person with rational thinking, can well introduce such new things that have been forgotten or neglected? So, I write this today, just to let everyone know that in the 1990s, China had introduced a kind of real "AI (artificial intelligence)" software that was originally even less intelligent than Paramecium. But this kind of software is no longer mentioned in such a developed computer world today. (Please download the game here: Please forgive my indiscriminate use of words and confusing introduction. You know, how can a liberal arts student who has no basic knowledge in science, the most incompletely remembered person with rational thinking, can well introduce such new things that have been forgotten or neglected? So, I write this today, just to let everyone know that in the 1990s, China had introduced a kind of real "AI (artificial intelligence)" software that was originally even less intelligent than Paramecium. But this kind of software is no longer mentioned in such a developed computer world today. (Please download the game here: Please forgive my indiscriminate use of words and confusing introduction. You know, how can a liberal arts student who has no basic knowledge in science, the most incompletely remembered person with rational thinking, can well introduce such new things that have been forgotten or neglected? So, I write this today, just to let everyone know that in the 1990s, China had introduced a kind of real "AI (artificial intelligence)" software that was originally even less intelligent than Paramecium. But this kind of software is no longer mentioned in such a developed computer world today. (Please download the game here:http://iml5.ys168.com/ But there should be no machine that can run it now)
This makes me very doubtful whether the introduction of "Software" is true, or is it a gimmick? However, I installed it on my computer with great interest and played for a long time. The result-well, very boring. That kind of little game-style software is actually a few dots of different colors. Each dot represents a kind of life, maybe a male or a female. You are acting as the natural world, providing them with the material of life at a specific time. Next, it is these little beings who thrive on their own. The editor said that at that time, many scientists from various countries were playing this kind of program in their spare time, designing it, and then giving certain conditions, and then they discovered that these lives may not be reflected in the way set by artificial intelligence. Gradually formed his own set of stress responses, gradually growing, survival and development, passed on from generation to generation... It is a pity that I am just like Neo who just ran out of the false world in The Matrix. Others are fascinated by the constantly changing green numbers of 0 and 1 in front of the black screen, but I still can't see what those beings are doing-they are constantly squirming, moving without a clue, colliding, repelling, attracting, and then Some died, some merged suddenly, some became three... In the end, these small programs of mine disappeared. Because I came across a well-known software-CIH virus that everyone knows all over the world. My hard drive is completely destroyed. The CIH virus is said to have broken the idea that mankind has always been proud of-software cannot destroy computer hardware. So human beings are guilty. The future that computers bring to mankind has also begun to darken. (3) Actually, I have digressed thousands of miles. Originally, I wanted to talk about the movie "Mechanical Enemy". When I went to Hong Kong last year, the entire subway was promoting this film. He hesitated for a while, and finally didn't look at it. Robots, conspiracies, and evolution are just these gimmicks. It's just that when I repeat it today, I suddenly think of the smart software. "Machine Public Enemy" said that robots may give people some surprises, for example, they will gradually have "dreams." Dreams have become the biggest difference between whether you really have human thoughts. Once robots have "dreams", then they will have thoughts. We can't call them "them", but "them" with independent names. The movie gave three laws to robots. However, according to the current level of computer evolution, perhaps a few hundred years later, how should we face the development of robots? We can string together Hollywood movies and almost see a history of robot development: In the beginning, humans made robots and used them to enjoy a better life. —— "Artificial Intelligence" However, one day, humans discovered that robots originally had their own will, and could even explain the three laws of robots by themselves-"Mechanical Enemy"; therefore, humans regained control after fighting against robots. Up the robot. ——"Future World" (I wonder if there are any Chinese remember this old-fashioned science fiction film many years ago?) However, it is a pity that the attitude of human beings alone is slowly making the robots secretly resist. In the end, it finally defeated and controlled the human race. --"The Matrix". This is a fairly coherent Hollywood story. Compared to the scene in Japan's "Astro Boy" ("Peter Pan"), where humans so easily declared that robots and humans have the same treatment in life, Hollywood's thinking is much deeper and more realistic-because the tone is , Human beings have too many inferiorities that make them unable to live on an equal footing with alien creatures, otherwise the human race problem would have been solved long ago. Human beings discriminate against people in backward places, let alone create robots against themselves? Humans naturally want to control and require robots to serve us and must abide by our rules. Because the same is true of God. God made Adam and Eve, so Adam and Eve must abide by God's rules. However, human beings have forgotten what they called out: God, you created me, but you can’t ask me to follow your rules unconditionally. Similarly, future robots will also require this. So, where should we go? In fact, if you really need an answer, the answer is simple: human beings abandon their prejudices, remove their own shortcomings, and re-enter the world of unity (why should I say that it is a new one?), to a world of peace, love, kindness, and equality. In this way, the future that humanity will face is much better. Forget it, this kind of answer, whether it's Hollywood, various novels, or even religion, all say so. But in the end, the Crusades still ended, and Islam still infiltrated the West. Even the Buddhist Tibet established a political and religious regime in the assassination. (5) Here, we will not discuss any religion, otherwise I can publish a book. The last discussion in "Machine Public Enemy" is what the host said, "According to the three laws of robots, in order to ensure the normal and good sustainable development of your human beings, you are like children, we must save you..." This let me I remembered what the leaders of countries such as Saddam meant-you people are always making mistakes. You are so mentally retarded, so we need to manage you, so we need you to be honest and obedient to ensure you The future and the future are bright. The reason why we are so powerful and authoritarian is all because we want to save you like children!
View more about I, Robot reviews
