this way, he is also the kind of Catherine Schelling said-a person who cannot achieve even one success in his life-because as long as he (formerly F. Schlegel) obtains a small Small success, then his life will be ruined.
Some people must always be suppressed by misfortune and silence without taking a breath. Anyone who cannot understand this cannot understand the abundance and breadth of human thought.
However, after the stalker, he was separated from his own land after all-the nature of the Russians is like this, and he cannot even leave the Russian land by a Russian foot-once he is separated, then he loses his own roots; what he depends on Soil up. Turgenev is like this, Solzhenitsyn is like this, is Tarkovsky an exception?
This is the basic characteristic of all Russian poets, writers and artists. Inseparability. Even though, in the air of the Soviet Union... But it was destined that they could not leave even a small step. For example, homesickness, sacrifice, this is just an attempt to cross the sky to return to the Russian soil, but the result...
In fact, this is the fate of most artists—the fate of the soil.
Or, buried in the soil of his homeland for life until the belated discoverer unearthed the treasure from the tomb. Or, you must live in a foreign country, fight against the whole nature in the incomprehension and even wildness, and be a "prophet who will not be accepted by the hometown" for life. However, in either case, it doesn't look very good.
What the bitter vibrato of the poet in the mirror cannot explain... is the anti-humanity that transcends humanity. And this "anti-humanity" is precisely a state of nature—the universe. It can't be shaken by what people think. It is the mountains and the ocean. People must adapt instead of standing in front of the mountains or the sea and shouting: Ah, I want to conquer you! Regarding this, Conrad has made the human stupidity very clear, and there is no need to say more.
Comment:
Before the final transition was completed, the narrative rhythm was stretched too long—although it was necessary—and the attention to Rublev was dispersed among the characters on all sides, making the whole structure slightly bloated. For the ravages of the city by the betrayed princes and Tatars, it was too long and unnecessary. Of course, clock-making and monastic life are indispensable, but a complete narrative is a great destruction of style.
Obviously, Tarkovsky tried to use more complex narrative techniques to explain the value of life of this medieval artist who combined ethnicity and religion. Of course, from this point of view, not only is there no problem with the theme and theme, but it should be said that it is a good idea with the foundation of a timeless and profound artistic masterpiece. However, in terms of reflecting the image of the nation—or how to capture the image needed by the author from the nationality, Tasman is not clever, more precisely, it is slightly clumsy—and Parajenov The difference is that the former does not know how to grasp the poetic nature contained in the national character; naturally he does not know how to express this.
In the Naked Bathing Festival and the Tatar invasion, the realistic recording mode not only failed to capture useful things from the complex scenes, but the scenes were scattered in the intricate scenes, weak, light, pan and tracking shots. They lack determination. Therefore, the scene of the big scene is not the pureness agitated from the chaos he wants, but the chaos itself. This is a failure.
The bell-casting paragraph is clean and plain, and the usage here is worthy of recognition. The problem is that almost all the passages have the same rhythm-the technique that has an effect on the final improvement, in the early stage of the film, it breaks up the rigor of the structure, making the accumulation of emotions unreasonably long, and for the ruble. Liao Fu's external psychological portrayal is too frequent and should be avoided.
On the whole, the film's application in the scene seems to be trapped in a certain confusion and cannot fully exploit its advantages.
View more about Andrei Rublev reviews
