The "again" written here is an impression. Impression movies have always been used in other movies in some places. For example, when Wallace turned into a walrus with long teeth, I thought there would be a "counterattack." When this counterattack came, the old man opened the walrus skin of the human skin and stood up. The film gave Wallace a shot of looking up at the old man. This look, this lens, is a big "again", I basically see that everyone can reflex here-Wallace is going to counterattack! The background music at that time, the sound of drums, drums and drums was very suitable-I thought of the Ekismo in my mind.
I actually like the screenwriter of this movie very much. You must know that the movie didn't look like a horror movie for a long time. So the dialogue between actors has become a good flavoring agent, and anyone who has seen it will be very impressed with the flag ridicule (this "blue" can also be used in future chats). The lines of this script are really well written. Whether it is straightforward storytelling, such as the memories of the old man, or the ridiculous tone of the host during the podcast, such as the easter eggs in the back and the "kill bill boy" in the front, they all make the film an indispensable part of the fullness of the film.
I recommend you to check it out when you have time. It will not look particularly boring and will not teach you anything to be disappointed. I categorize "Long Fang" as the kind of movie that can be given to a three-star by looking at the introduction, that is, it's okay-
this kind of movie can't jump off a trick, it's ironic. Maybe the director didn't want to be satirical, and the screenwriter was just used to add some stalkers such as calling for help, friends not answering the phone, going to the bathroom and found a list with beautiful fonts that did not look like a flyer. Here I want to share a concept: because this is a movie, I know that there will be some dramatic parts in the horrible place, but it may not happen in reality. What should I say here?
Oh-it's the kind of stalk that would have just cut off the opponent with a single knife, and had to say a lot of nonsense, missed the opportunity, and then was counterattacked by the opponent. However, the counterattack in the movie here, I also agree that it is the old man's mercy. Some people in the film critics mentioned that the old man should be liberated inside. I don’t know if it’s because this pervert is an elderly person. As mentioned earlier, in reality, it can be considered that the purpose of this pervert has been achieved (please think about how many people the elderly killed and how to dismember these victims). Isn't it a kind of tolerance to achieve the goal-the
protagonist's good friends are quite impressive to me. I can’t say that he is good, he is obviously selfish; I can’t say that it’s not good, after all he went to save Wallace; but I can’t say that he is a good friend, and finally went to see Walrus Wallace, this man has a somewhat expression Less flat. So if we discuss human nature in depth, this dear friend is the best object of expression—contradictory and ordinary.
So the question is, does Wallace become a walrus or do he voluntarily become a walrus?
View more about Tusk reviews
