First of all, there is no clear rule stating that a tie must die. It is just a rule judged by a person based on facts, not necessarily a real rule. You can refer to the theory of the shooter and the farmer in the three-body theory, so there are two possibilities.
1. In the event of a tie, those who tie the ticket will be randomly executed.
2. In fact, you can live when the votes are tied, but some people vote secretly, but everyone does not know who it is, so they think that the votes are tied. (Maybe it’s just that I can’t get out even after such a waste, it’s better to throw someone to death to increase my chances of survival)
The second argument is certified at the end of the film
Because the baby and the last man had a tie, the man stretched out his hand but didn't make a fist. The camera went directly to the black screen and didn't let us see it. So it is possible for a man to live without making a fist. (Perhaps a man can deceive others to commit suicide, but he cannot tolerate himself but cannot kill a baby. This should be for moral reasons)
Human nature is very complicated. There is no absolute black and white. Either good or evil. It feels that most people are in a gray area where good and evil are mixed.
The emergence of morality is also because it satisfies the interests of most people, and it is acquiesced by most people.
So even if morality is the shackles of evil, but shackles are not necessarily evil. In short, morality makes us beautiful, why not do it? No, guys.
If I missed some plots and didn't notice, I welcome your suggestions.
View more about Circle reviews
