Interruption: It turns out that you have to tick the evaluation before you write a comment. . After hesitating for a moment, I clicked “Recommend”. Just for the final subtitles of the film, I strongly recommend it. Text: Before I went to college, I probably never watched documentaries or never had any feelings for documentaries. I went to school on the first day of college. The first film we watched was the documentary Zhang Yiqing’s "Kindergarten". It was really well-intentioned (but it turns out that our school only has the kung fu of school education to do better...) Later, I like to watch documentaries and learn. I have learned some basic knowledge of documentaries, but the more I learn, the more confused I have always felt that the documentary form will become popular in the future, because when people are so familiar with the plot of Hollywood genre films and the dreams of Cinderella and Snow White are smashed, it will definitely be. I hope to turn to observing my own life or the lives of people around me. Because the heart of gossip is common to everyone and is more real, it looks better and satisfies the public's ever-expanding heart of entertainment. Just after I prophesied, it didn’t take long for the super girl to become popular. Who said that reality shows are not documentaries? Since then, the boundaries of documentaries have been blurred. Whenever a documentary is born, many people will stand up and say that the shooting is too strong, BLABLABLA, in fact, I don’t care why I am I don’t think that "Nanuk in the North" is so dull because I like to watch Nanuk stab a seal coming up and grabbing and nibbling because I haven’t eaten seals like this before--so I always think this is it in a narrow manner. The documentary lets people know how other people live and live, and then when they return to their lives after watching the film, there will be some changes. That’s enough. In fact, this is the text: I’m a computer idiot when I download the film. Thinking about what kind of file extension is INC? After watching the film, I realized that I was still an English idiot. . . The film structure is good and clear. I like this kind of paragraph-like structure, layer by layer. What the director wants to say is very clear so that I can understand. This is also a feature of this film in the audiovisual language: the regular and very regular picture. I said that the composition is balanced and the shots are pretty good. I remember that there was a scene where a lot of corn was planted. A panoramic shot with a slight elevation angle was piled up like a hill of corn and a crane. The background was very blue. The sky and white clouds were a little backlit. This picture gave me. I’m very impressed. Sometimes When filming, it was just a subtle point and noticed that the whole picture will look great. There is also a question of the interviewee’s scene. This is one of the areas where I think the details of this film are better. When Kevin’s mother was interviewed I gave the scene stuck above the neck. There is only one other place in the whole film that uses the same scene. When the director himself explained the inside story of the worker’s arrest, there are no other scenes that are so close. I have always liked one. The word is humanistic care. Although it has been said to be bad, there are few people who really do it. How can it be called humanistic care? I used a close-up shot of the mother of a child who died of food poisoning because of food safety issues. I used a close-up to shoot the explanation of the vicious treatment of workers by the food company. I zoomed in on this sorrow to zoom in on this anger. I think this is humanistic care. This also involves another sensitive topic. Director consciousness. I also vaguely sniff out the traces of the director’s "strength" in this film. He is trying to expound his views or "appealing" if it reaches the point of "appealing". It’s a bit too much because if it’s an appeal, I always feel that there seems to be some conspiracy in the beginning of the film. The beginning of the film is still leisurely. Let me see it and I will also feel shocked--) However, as the film develops, the whole rhythm has changed a bit urgent, because the whole film gives me the feeling that it is urgent to break the balance. Some people say that although the documentary requires objectivity True, but if you shoot a documentary of Auschwitz concentration camp objectively and truthfully, it is definitely not a good director. But I also think that sometimes the lens can explain everything. This is the power of the image itself. I think documentaries require a director. Consciousness in it can’t explain the problem, but the problem should only be revealed by the facts rather than compulsively requiring the audience to accept. Throughout the history and modernity, all excellent literary works or film and television works can make the audience feel a lot of emotions and different. The reason why a thousand readers of reflection can produce a thousand Hamlet is not because every reader has a Hamlet in his heart, but because the complexity and objectivity displayed by Hamlet itself can make the readers produce such a variety of colors. My feelings about Hamlet. The issue of food safety has been a relatively hot topic in recent years. Documentaries like this have emerged at the historic moment. I think it also gives a sigh of illness to the documentary form that has not been paid attention to by the public.
View more about Food, Inc. reviews
