As a science fiction film, it cannot be said to be a passing Hollywood American commercial science fiction film. As a sequel to the 2001 Space Odyssey, it is even less worthy.
1. This movie is filled with lines, full of lines but no aesthetic feeling, as if the characters are chattering at home, forming a strong contrast with the few and philosophical lines in the previous work. It can be said that people are more popular than others; 2 .Whether it is the design of the sense of science and technology in the scene or the explanation of the background, this 2010 is too detailed, so detailed that it makes people lose the space of imagination, which kills the beauty of the movie, and the white space and the unknown are even more reverie. 3. Although the original work is based on the Cold War background, the film is too simplified in the adaptation process, and the conception is too superficial. The old-fashioned dualistic ideology does make people yawn again and again, and the final confession is only world peace, if Literary works can only achieve this level of thinking, I think it is sad; 4. Many small details are even more inexplicable, demonizing the inhumanity of the Soviet Union, and the Soviet female astronauts surrendered to the male protagonist Dr. Freud. Hugging, etc., will only make people feel that the taste is vulgar.
I think Peter Hyams should go to an action movie obediently, and it would be better to show his male hormones that are nowhere to be there.
View more about 2010: The Year We Make Contact reviews
