It's probably that this background is "known to the people of the earth" for Americans, so the director is too lazy to talk about it, but I am not an earthling, I am a Martian, I really don't know or understand. The Afghans planted bombs on the land of Afghanistan-even cut open the belly of their own country's flowers, and made their compatriots into human bombs-just to toss the American soldiers? ! Damn, the Afghan resistance group is too frantic. In contrast, the American soldiers are too kind and fraternity-I kept sighing at the time when their former captain sacrificed, "I would have fired when I changed to an old lady! When your teammates are on the front line, don't you have to wait for the opponent to press Button off?! Hesitate to P!".
Afterwards, the development of the plot continued to confirm the point that "Afghan Resistance Organization is an extinction of humanity, regardless of the life and death of its own compatriots. And American soldiers are the most humane, and are the angels who save Afghan children and uncles." This is not necessarily the director here. The point of concern in the film, but this smell is as unavoidable as Hong Kong feet with socks off.
I was thinking right now, if the Japanese won more than 60 years ago, and the East Asian co-prosperity circle would have been established, would "Landmine War" become a group of guerrillas with hairy chests, burying landmines everywhere in the village regardless of the life and death of Chinese civilians. Or simply tie landmines to Chinese children as traps. And if the brave, fearless and kind-hearted imperial army, in order to save the people of China, if they disregarded their own safety, they would go deep and dangerously to destroy the bombs... Thinking of this level, I fought two cold wars, and decided that I could no longer think about it.
Of course, whether the Afghan resistance organization is really so frantic and whether the American bomb disposal unit is really so bravely sacrificed, I have never been to the local area and seeing it is believing, it is hard to tell. But the aggressor’s insistence on portraying himself as this savior is very expressive. I don’t think most of the Afghan people-at least for now-will not agree (after all, the director still has this common sense, and a group of children have been photographed. Throw stones on the U.S. military vehicle).
It’s hard to say what people from other countries feel about seeing this film, but as a citizen of my own country who has almost been invaded not long ago, I can only say "tmd is too masculine!"
What is tmd language hegemony? Ah, what is tmd strong X truth, what is tmd history is just a flower girl~~~ Just watch the Americans invading other countries. Except for the Vietnam War, who would reflect on it after twenty years after the last defeat, the rest... after all, they are all right, and they are all very kind, they are all forced to invade others, so that's right. Therefore, Chinese filmmakers have to be up for it, otherwise they will be like Afghanistan in the future, because they can't make movies, maybe they will be X alive and they will be said to be because your skirt is too short, etc.~~ ~
Skip the ideological part of the face, and talk about the movie as far as the movie is concerned.
There are two very obtrusive scenes in the movie that make me really incomprehensible. One is the first slow-motion shot at the beginning. I have to say that this shot was beautifully shot. It should be the most beautiful shot in the whole film. The soil on the car began to vibrate to exploded, and the captain wearing the locker flew up. , In one go, the atmosphere is very good. Finally, when the captain flies, it must be a French poster. If it is not a war theme, I will collect it for this level of beauty. Probably because of this, the director can't delete it.
This is very unpleasant.
Because I quickly discovered that this film belongs to the "documentary style" (or that sentence, there is no investigation and no right to speak, I don't know whether Yi is really "documentary", so the following words are only used to describe the "style" "). The advantage of documentary is to win the trust of the audience. For example, Godar, who never wants to mix reality with the movie, often puts two shots in the movie to remind the audience that "this is a movie", and those who follow the documentary route have to avoid this completely and let The audience thought they had seen an expansion, and even the best front-line reports in the battlefield. So this shot at the beginning was emotional because it was taken too beautifully. Whenever there is emotion, it becomes fake. It is incompatible with the attitude of "I am very objective, I am very outside, and I am very cold" in the subsequent stand-up pictures. I don’t know if it was to offset the sense of incongruity in this shot. The director added a slow shot of the bullet landing in the subsequent sniper battle (or wanted to pay tribute to "The King of War"?), that is also a very good one. Beautiful but I personally hate the lens.
The director's first hand: be willing. Reluctant to delete because the lens is beautiful also depends on the occasion. These two shots are not bad in the backstage, but they are awkward and undecided in the movie. Obviously, the crisp, crisp and simple overall style has been lost in these two episodes.
The actor Jeremy Renner is very suitable to play the American soldier. First of all, his butt is very cocked (Audience: You~~~) Secondly, his face is said to be "boy next door" in the United States, and it is really "passerby". Very fusion, not like Brother Tom in "Rising Clouds"-although I don't think he is handsome, his reputation has always been very handsome all over the world-the audience will do psychological construction as soon as he appears on the stage. Well, the hero is here". JR is not playing a hero, but a person who can't find fun or his place in a real life and a calm environment. He chewed gum, listened to rock music, took off the locker and climbed to dismantle the bomb, not because he was brave and heroic, but because he didn't care about being alive anyway, and of course he was not afraid of death. There was only the challenge of dismantling bombs. The thrill of a life of nine deaths made him feel alive.
This setting is wonderful. Because this is probably the feeling that young people nowadays-including myself-often have: I don't know what it means to open my eyes to eat and close my eyes to sleep every day.
This makes me a "Hong Kong slave" think of TVB for the first time~~~ TVB and the Hong Kong government have an agreement to shoot some promotional films every year, so in the past two decades when I watched Hong Kong movies, it almost took the Hong Kong police I have visited all the departments of the company (from the O record to the anti-1000 group, the anti-criminal group, the anti-pornography group, the forensic department, the commercial crime investigation department, and the Ministry of Transportation. It’s just a matter of returning the lost property, my sweat!), to the Hong Kong police The job organization of the company is even more familiar with the recruiting conditions than the film police in our community, and of course there are ICAC (the first professional ideal of my life is to watch "Musker Tenderness"), the fire brigade, and the Big Dipper (social worker) , Flight service team, etc. etc. etc. The so-called "propaganda film" not only introduces the knowledge related to the department to the public, but also helps the government to recruit people. Based on these two purposes, the protagonist in the film is not like the "main theme" filmed in a certain area. It is often not set as a "high complete" role. While having personality and charm, there will be one or two shortcomings. The beauty of men and handsome women should also be kept at a "reasonable" level, which is to let the audience I have both yearning and a sense of identity, and when introducing the content of the work, I don’t focus too much on welfare issues. I will really take out the difficulties that may be encountered in reality and show some things. The dark side of the workplace-of course, the general direction still needs to be fixed.
So when the male protagonist's last face seemed to have just resolved constipation, he set foot on Afghanistan again to "rescue" the Afghan people who were living under the danger of bombs, I almost didn't spit out a sip of Coke~~~ Dare to love this film is just a large-scale presentation. Coming. It is said that TVB senior Chen Zhiyun was recently arrested on suspicion of corruption. I don't know if any of his arresters were called by TVB's propaganda film and admitted to the judicial department. Twenty years later, if the soldiers who were moved to join the army in Afghanistan retired from the army and returned to make a film about what is not an all-metal shell accusing the hypocrisy and cruelty of the war.
This kind of movie of a certain A playing a certain B, a certain A insists on saying that he is a good person. Look at the little robot is very cute, the male protagonist's butt is very cocked, and the locker is pretty cool, that's all. The important thing is to remember in your heart that if this kind of Rashomon incident happens to you in the future, you must seize the right to speak. No matter whether you are in fact reasonable or unreasonable, the truth can be hardened anyway, and the facts can be distorted. History is What can be altered, the truth can be concealed. Shameless people are invincible in the world.
Completion part:
This film is indeed in a "documentary" style, and it has all the documentary elements that it should have: no background music, shaking with the camera, keeping a certain distance from the protagonist and not doing too many close-ups.
But "documentary" does not mean "true." Recording only one side, part, and facts is called "selective recording". I think its fundamental purpose is to use explosions, cowboys, and the smell of sweat and gunpowder to stimulate the hormones of male animals in the name of documentary.
In sniper warfare or street fighting, when American soldiers fired, the opponents were injured and fell, let alone close-ups, many of them couldn't even see their faces. This is a typical "materialization" technique, because the camera has never been on the side of the "enemy", so the audience following the camera naturally stands in the same perspective as the American soldiers, and does not regard the other party as a specific "human." It's just the "target" to hit. In fact, the local resisters—or “terrorists,” as the Americans call them “terrorists,” some families with sons, who are also trapped on the battlefield to kill—they are really called “forced”, and the Americans want to withdraw their troops. The Mao business is gone. The Americans call it "fucky"; they will also start a party and dance after falling down a few American soldiers, but the audience can't see this~~~ only the flesh and blood of the American soldiers. Flying up in the most beautiful shot of the whole film, blood splattered...
Conversely, not to mention the regulars on the American soldier's side, even the soy sauce role of the bounty hunter was a guest appearance by Ralph Fiennes, and the whole shot followed that. Called a tight, let him get along with the audience for a while, only when the shot collapsed, he was still close when he collapsed, and I was shocked when the shot was solid.
As for the local people rescued by the American soldiers, it shows how pitiful they are and how long they are for the rescue of the American savior. At this time, the camera is no longer shaken, and the distance is no longer needed. I wish the audience could see their blood clearly. How sticky, how salty the tears are~~~~
It's like writing a composition called "realistic" by a person, but using all positive words for a certain A, and all derogatory words for a certain B word. When the reader has not read the composition, the negative IQ goes out? ! reality? Real P... Really is the tofu shop opened by your home
View more about The Hurt Locker reviews
