Just want to discuss with other film critics, by the way, my opinion.
1. The guide.
Others say that the guide may kill people, while others say that the guide won't do it. Let me refute the possibility that the guide killed Marcus the glasses. It’s all at the end that the guide is actually wanted, but you didn’t notice that the guide himself explained that he is a communist, at least an anti-social person, politically incorrect, and wanted by the authorities. This may be the biggest. It's not about killing people and getting things done.
There are indeed many opportunities for the guide to kill. According to the material of the movie, how to kill with a shotgun and a machete is all right. The three weak men got up in the middle of the night and wiped their necks without a chance.
In the final outcome, I feel that Marcus has a great chance of being killed. The guide may be alive but Marcus will not show up when he is dead. Others say that he found the Indian village and the gold mine... Ending 1 and Marcus Happily stay in the gold mine, Ending 2 kills Marcus and owns the gold mine, Ending 3 is killed by the people in the gold mine, ending 4 I went to a gold mine by myself. 1, 2 It's impossible to use your brain. What is the meaning of having wealth? It must be consumed. In addition, just to attract the attention of these lads, he raised his mouth. He might want to find gold, but from the previous expressions, the guide is not heinous. He left the team members and ran to find the gold. People.
When Potter was surviving, he recalled the guide's words: Walk along the river. He could survive, but the healthy man, the guide, died? It feels like it won't, and he definitely wants to walk on the shore. I tend to have the guide not dead, but Marcus is dead, so he simply can't come out.
2, Marcus
glasses have a high chance of death, and his feet are so badly rotten. But seeing Potter's feet, I feel that Potter can survive, and the glasses actually have a chance to survive. It's just that he keeps walking, which may be slightly difficult.
3. Grumpy partner
Nothing to comment on, anyhow I brought someone back to the rescue. But it was really too much to despise others with Potter. When it's good, it's a brother, and it's a bit burdensome. It's really a bit haha for you to turn your face in an instant. But foreign movies don't pay much attention to karma, and we have nothing to say. During the period Marcus cried pitifully, they just showed that the day would be fine, and it was disgusting.
4, Potter
Potter play was really good, although the play more annoying dogs pull gut sub 1 hours to drag into the mountains. But Potter held up the whole place behind, yes!
5. Hypocrisy and untrue.
After all, other people's movies are somewhat documentary. Besides, they are originally movies, but they are adapted from real stories. It would be nice if they can correspond to a few names. The story of the jungle, you, I, and the director have not experienced it, so you say that others are wrong?
But I still like Harry Potter better.
View more about Jungle reviews
