Small comment

Personally, I think the biggest flaw of the movie is the lack of prominence of the theme, saying that it highlights the goodness of human nature. A large number of pages depict the hazy feelings between a gay and non-GAY man with a sense of atonement and a transgender woman. The latter has very little relevance to the former. If it is a touching story about love, I think it is a deformed feeling that is more prominent. This deformity is in atonement, compassion, and a sense of identity. Feelings are not love. I prefer to define the subject itself as the lonely sorrow of loneliness in this unidentified world.
In some places, festivity can appear, but the lens has always continued this purely objective film concept, so the places that should be rendered and sublimated have always been low-key processing, making this emotional movie that is difficult to summarize social values, and it is not touching. . For example, the scenes that can be recognized in the mood and plot after Deere was in a coma after taking medicine. The movie has a very rigid fixed lens and an objective perspective. At this time, even if it is a small movement of the lens, or a lot of With the help of the subjective perspective of some characters, it will be much better.
The reason why I am said to be a lonely sorrow of lonely self-admiration. This is because in the feelings of a few of them, there is no “noble contribution”. When summed up, their contribution to each other is satisfied with the “frog nature” of the province’s character and the craziness of erotic desire, at least in In the last scene, when Dier went to see Fergus, what I read was indifference, Dill was indulging in self-imagination, and Fergus was still in psychological resistance.
In dealing with Fergus and Jody’s footage, the camera is too ambiguous and open. In short, in the end, there is no psychology of entering Fergus. Did the director consciously leave the protagonist in between? If it is deliberately this This kind of technique (when the movie deals with the protagonist and other characters consciously narrows the distance of each other's scenes), I thought that at the end, I didn't agree with anyone, and kept asking why and why? Because the other two protagonists are weird regardless of the actor's charm and the situation given by the script.
The advantage is that he can see the director’s artistic skills, and even some Hollywood musicals, especially when it is used well, it can accurately grasp various situations and dreamy reality. For example, the side backlight effect in the bar is very beautiful.
What the movie lacks is a subjective perspective. If you get into the psychology of the character a little bit, you won’t be thinking about it and summing it up after watching it. Also, if the ending of the movie is set to be tragic, and it has a tragic beauty, I think it would be better.

View more about The Crying Game reviews