Van Gogh, the "human blood steamed bun" of the public. I don’t know why this film is so highly rated. Many well-meaning friends sent me an introduction as early as a year ago. I was questioned or even disgusted from the beginning. What is this going to do? A speculative taste came over. Until the overwhelming propaganda, what hundreds of painters and artists (hello everyone, the pictures in the movie can not be counted as artists), how many years have passed, so and so won the prize, what production team... Please tell me, everyone is after watching the movie Most of the former labels are hooliganism. In order to attract money, they are also considerate of not being tricked. But I have to look at it professionally. Such a picture is inferior, and the story is difficult to pass. The formal language of the movie seriously hinders the expression of the content. Brother, what is the word poor, what is the word not expressing the meaning, you have done it! Regarding the structure and text of the film, no
It's my major, so I won't repeat it. I believe your instincts will feel that the logic and narrative of the film are improper.
To say without mercy, this film has nothing but hard work. (I've seen friends do oil painting animations with my own eyes. That's really bitter!) Van Gogh's good thing is that he has that unique life. Anyone who wants to copy his style and brushstrokes, styles, and even modeling theory will be overwhelming and counterproductive. . Van Gogh's paintings are static, and oil paintings are static. Those brushstrokes are "movable" only when they are still. Once activated, the rotation will change. This is a disaster for my personal aesthetics. Fancy, messy, dazzling, completely lost respect, ignoring the smooth and quiet checks and balances in Van Gogh's paintings, Van Gogh looked at
It would be embarrassing, and even disagree with such a mess, there is no abstract beauty. Only some label styles have to pile up. From the analysis of professional language, one can tell that this director is an oil painting layman. The main language of the whole film is an excerpt from the later period of Van Gogh, that is, after Paris was influenced by Ukiyo-e, the pursuit of three-dimensionality was weakened, and the pursuit of a flat formal language, in short, is 2D. You can't even find light sources and shadows, only outlines and colors are left, but the colors are not flat. Some light color theories at the time are used, which are characterized by non-intrinsic colorization and use complementary colors to make colors harmonious. In the film, all the pictures borrowed from the original lens are in the original language of Van Gogh, but as long as the original lens of the film, especially the black and white lens that is transformed into a poor oil painting style, it is very embarrassing to make the oil painting movie gimmick. Inferior. Many story lines are limited by the screen, flat or deep? This is a difficult one to reconcile
Contradiction, is the director indifferent to it? As a fan of Van Gogh, I don't agree with such "consumption" of Van Gogh. This is not "Van Gogh", Van Gogh is dead, lying in Orwell's grave. This is just a projection of Van Gogh, magnifying and distorting the function of idols in people's hearts. This is a consumption of Van Gogh, consumption of the big IP "Vincent Van Gogh" that is still alive and lively. How did Van Gogh die? suicide? He killed? It is said in the movie that he died anyway, and it doesn't matter how he died. In other words, I said with no good intentions, the important thing is how you consume him, how to misunderstand him methodically, and how to use Van Gogh to leave a second tear for your own destiny. This is disrespect for Van Gogh. If it is serious, it is a mentality that the customer is God. Van Gogh is just a waiter who gives you a mental massage.
That's it. Massage your unwillingness, massage your ambiguous attitude towards death, massage the tension between poverty and wealth. Van Gogh is undoubtedly the most famous and most expensive painter in the world. Except for Picasso, no one has several museums of his own. Except for Leonardo da Vinci, no one is as famous as Van Gogh. All publishers are delighted to get relevant Van Gogh content, it must be the best seller! All top museums are proud of collecting his works, and all peripheral products related to him will become best-selling. I don’t know how to count the "Van Gogh" pauper, in his
The "gross production value" created in the hundred years after death, I guess, should be more amazing than Apple Amazon, and it will last for a long time. Van Gogh turned into an idol, like Apollo in charge of the sun, Athena in charge of wisdom and war, and Venus in charge of love and desire... The "frustrated life" and "wronged life" of "Van Gogh" who are still living in people's hearts Suffering", "the pity of early death". And the sense of disappointment and the tragedy of fate in this life is not exactly the great
Do most people resonate? This resonance shaped Van Gogh's image. But what does Van Gogh think? The answer is fluttering in the wind. Some people may think that such a judgment is not moderate. I also agree that my original intention is not to slander the film, but to provide my own incomplete perspective and a reference angle. In short, I would rather go to Van Gogh ninety times
In the Museum of Art, I have looked at Van Gogh's picture 90 times, and I don't want to spend another 90 minutes watching this superficial tribute to Van Gogh. How Van Gogh died, according to various articles and materials, at present, the possibility of homicide is quite high. Even if it was homicide, the murderer and evidence have disappeared in history. When future generations traced this story, the first thing they encountered was a fog of interpretation by later generations, and this fog, and all the narrations about Van Gogh, would only get farther and farther away from the truth. Renxin is a processing factory, loves adding oil and vinegar, not the original flavor. Many times, among the answers and truths that people hope for, people will not hesitate to choose what they hope. After all, without the threat of death and failure, people only need what they want. Otherwise, Socrates and Jesus are both. Will not die unjustly. Today's news push, information push, and product promotion all follow this dark iron law of human nature. Many times, we really don’t know what is missing
, Or don’t know what happened to him in the end. The truth is shy, she will always hide in the shortest time. The question is, will Van Gogh's destiny be yours? I think of "Human Blood Steamed Buns" written by Lu Xun, which is ill-fated and ill-fated. Van Gogh is probably such a place
Van Gogh, the "human blood steamed bun" of the public.
I don’t know why this film is so highly rated. Many well-meaning friends sent me an introduction as early as a year ago. I was questioned or even disgusted from the beginning. What is this going to do? A speculative taste came over. Until the overwhelming propaganda, what hundreds of painters and artists (hello everyone, the pictures in the movie can not be counted as artists), how many years have passed, so and so won the prize, what production team... Please tell me, everyone is after watching the movie Most of the former labels are hooliganism. In order to attract money, they are also considerate of not being tricked. But I have to look at it professionally. Such a picture is inferior, and the story is difficult to pass. The formal language of the movie seriously hinders the expression of the content. Brother, what is the word poor, what is the word not expressing the meaning, you have done it! Regarding the structure and text of the film, it is not my major. I will not repeat it. I believe your intuition will also find the logic and narrative of the film to be improper.
To say without mercy, this film has nothing but hard work. (I have seen my friends do oil painting animations with my own eyes, it is really painful!)
The good thing about Van Gogh is that he has that unique life. Anyone who wants to copy his style and brushstrokes, styles, and even modeling theory will be too far, and it will be counterproductive. Van Gogh's paintings are static, and oil paintings are static. Those brushstrokes are "movable" only when they are still. Once activated, the rotation will change. This is a disaster for my personal aesthetics. Fancy, messy, dazzling, completely lost respect, ignoring the smooth and quiet checks and balances in Van Gogh's paintings, Van Gogh would be embarrassed to see it, and even disagree with such a mess, without abstract beauty. Only some label styles have to pile up.
From the analysis of professional language, one can tell that this director is an oil painting layman. The main language of the whole film is an excerpt from the later period of Van Gogh, that is, after Paris was influenced by Ukiyo-e, the pursuit of three-dimensionality was weakened, and the pursuit of a flat formal language, in short, is 2D. You can't even find light sources and shadows, only outlines and colors are left, but the colors are not flat. Some light color theories at the time are used, which are characterized by non-intrinsic colorization and use complementary colors to make colors harmonious. In the film, all the pictures borrowed from the original lens are in the original language of Van Gogh, but as long as the original lens of the film, especially the black and white lens that is transformed into a poor oil painting style, it is very embarrassing to make the oil painting movie gimmick. Inferior. Many story lines are limited by the screen, flat or deep? This is a contradiction that is difficult to reconcile. Does the director feel indifferent to it? As a fan of Van Gogh, I don't agree with such "consumption" of Van Gogh.
This is not "Van Gogh", Van Gogh is dead, lying in Orwell's grave. This is just a projection of Van Gogh, magnifying and distorting the function of idols in people's hearts. This is a consumption of Van Gogh, consumption of the big IP "Vincent Van Gogh" that is still alive and lively. How did Van Gogh die? suicide? He killed? It is said in the movie that he died anyway, and it doesn't matter how he died. In other words, I said with no good intentions, the important thing is how you consume him, how to misunderstand him methodically, and how to use Van Gogh to leave a second tear for your own destiny. This is disrespect for Van Gogh. If it is serious, it is a mentality that the customer is God. Van Gogh is just a waiter who gives you a mental massage. Massage your unwillingness, massage your ambiguous attitude towards death, massage the tension between poverty and wealth.
Van Gogh is undoubtedly the most famous and most expensive painter in the world. Except for Picasso, no one has several museums of his own. Except for Leonardo da Vinci, no one is as famous as Van Gogh. All publishers are delighted to get relevant Van Gogh content, it must be the best seller! All top museums are proud of collecting his works, and all peripheral products related to him will become best-selling. I don't know how to count the "Van Gogh" pauper, the "gross production" created in the hundred years after his death, I guess it should be more amazing than Apple Amazon, and it will endure for a long time.
Van Gogh turned into an idol, like Apollo in charge of the sun, Athena in charge of wisdom and war, and Venus in charge of love and desire... The "frustrated life" and "wronged life" of "Van Gogh" who are still living in people's hearts Suffering", "the pity of early death". And the sense of disappointment and the tragedy of fate in this life is not exactly what most people resonate with? This resonance shaped Van Gogh's image. But what does Van Gogh think? The answer is fluttering in the wind.
Some people may think that such a judgment is not moderate. I also agree that my original intention is not to slander the film, but to provide my own incomplete perspective and a reference angle. In short, I would rather go to the Van Gogh Museum 90 times and look at Van Gogh's paintings 90 times than to spend 90 minutes watching this superficial tribute to Van Gogh.
How Van Gogh died, according to various articles and materials, at present, the possibility of homicide is quite high. Even if it was homicide, the murderer and evidence have disappeared in history. When future generations traced this story, the first thing they encountered was a fog of interpretation by later generations, and this fog, and all the narrations about Van Gogh, would only get farther and farther away from the truth. Renxin is a processing factory, loves adding oil and vinegar, not the original flavor. Many times, among the answers and truths that people hope for, people will not hesitate to choose what they hope. After all, without the threat of death and failure, people only need what they want. Otherwise, Socrates and Jesus are both. Will not die unjustly. Today's news push, information push, and product promotion all follow this dark iron law of human nature. Many times, we really don't know what we are missing, or we don't know what we died in the end. The truth is shy, she will always hide in the shortest time.
The question is, will Van Gogh's destiny be yours? I think of "Human Blood Steamed Buns" written by Lu Xun, which is ill-fated and ill-fated. Van Gogh, it's probably such an earth-class "human blood bun". Unfortunately, you and I may both be carnival ticks on Van Gogh's corpse.
View more about Loving Vincent reviews
