After watching this Bond movie, we will always ask, where is the climax? The most exciting is summarized in the trailer. The director does everything tepidly. It seems to leave the secrets to the audience. The audience who are used to the spicy soup will suddenly give us a little taste of Cantonese cuisine. People are at a loss. one. About the director: should a young literary and artistic youth come and play Bond? Foster has a sharp, huge forehead, two bat ears that can receive radio signals from Naboo, tall body and excellent performance in previous literary and artistic movies , Enough to make people believe that he is a smart man. He didn’t want to take Bond’s trip at first, but Daniel Craig wanted him to direct him. 80% of Craig also wanted to make the Bond film under his name become meaningful. The director After changing his mind and taking office, he asked veteran Paul Haggis to rewrite the script. Now it seems that this may be a silly doctrine, because the original script written by Paul for "Casino Royale" may be better. This time, the producer gave the director the greatest control. The virtue of a literary director would ruin the art if he didn’t give creative freedom, but the film didn’t have much literary art. In fact, you can either bring more of the literary level. As a result, you have to take into account the commercial aspect. The two weight balances are constant, which weakens the edge. Both sides are not good and thankless. The story of this film is not badly conceived, but if you follow the above, you will feel the end in all aspects. For example, the line of "bride" was originally used as a rope to continue the emotional action of Bond in the upper and lower episodes. Director Buried too deep, with a tough guy to resist the tenderness that should have been carried forward, except for the tears in Bond’s eyes that are left on the surface, the rest want to make the audience realize by themselves, and the lines they get are all N heavy. The context, as can be seen from the original film title, finally caused the subtext to dive into the deep water and even unable to float. The original tenderness of the iron man, who was so terribly weeping, was deprived of oxygen due to the director's personal performance. The most hypoxic person is Matthew Amarek. Don't think that you can accept the director's boring blankness after playing "Diving Bell". In the final analysis, Ford wants to take Bond away from the heavy commercial routines of the past, absorb the advantages of Casino Royale, and at the same time inject more exploratory blood into the sequel. If you want to shoot it, it is both good-looking and memorable, but the young literary and artistic youths tinker with Bond. , The spirit is commendable, the skill is still tender. To be honest, pioneering and innovation is not as miraculous as Martin Campbell, and Martin is a man who is very righteous. He has laid a good foundation for you and turned away and disappeared in the hidden forest. When the next generation of 007 will come out to be a hero, the director behind You follow the previous successful model and keep the next few movies at a stable level. The world is happy, why not do it. But Fortes was not the one who followed other people’s buttocks and tails, so he wanted to use Bond as an experiment. He didn’t have the energy to say. In the end, the truth is that we have been photographed for forty years, and no difference. Bond brought into an area that could be worse. I don’t want Bond to stick to the rules, and no matter how Bond changes, I agree with it. It doesn’t matter if you say "Bond, James Bond" for decades. Besides, Bond shouldn’t be in this episode. Clouds and rains on the bed, in that case, the theme of the film is overwhelmed, but the ever-changing changes to reduce the quality of the film are the prerequisites. 2. Regarding the action: the action is too literary, and the literary and artistic is very cold. I want to criticize the above. What I want to criticize is the editing, which is too fast, too short, and too scattered. According to the psychophysiology of people, you have to give him vision. A period of buffer stagnation, a screen should give him enough time or at least just the time to transmit information, especially action movies, the amount of information carried in the screen is inherently large, and you can give it less than one second for a screen, not to mention that you violate human physiology Rhythmic, at least uncomfortable to watch, and the continuity of the action is greatly reduced. This way, the action scene will be short, and everything will be settled in two or three minutes. It feels like a badass, the work of the staff behind the scenes is not worth the gain, and the main audience is not addictive. what! Why is the editing of "Bourage Bourne" as fast as it is excellent, because the Bonn story is mostly close fights, and the amount of information on the screen is not so large. The best one dealt with in this episode, in my opinion, is precisely the opening of the film. How long did Bond go to the hotel to investigate an indoor fight, and I have all the sense of realism and sharpness. The 007 series is at best for big scenes, flying into the sky and aircraft cannons. If you use Bonn to cut it, it will be greatly reduced. Moreover, the big scenes use so many close-ups. In the end, there is a scene where Bond jumps from the car. Looking at the tidbits, you will see that Craig did this action very well. As a result, the close-up in the movie is gone. I can’t see much of this. The technical content of the movement in one go, because your cuts are too scattered, just like splicing together in random shots. The last one was too sloppy, isn't it an organization all over the place? High-tech and fully armed, the result was that the Bond millet plus the rifle broke into the deepest part of the enemy line to face the BOSS in less than 2 minutes, and your Bond arm bullied us Matthew intellectuals are not kind, and Matthew has nothing to do. 2 No. Boss protection is even less authentic, Craig is so good, you don't get a rival character to fight a lot, I'm really sorry to the people of the world, the general is not counted, he is better, and he is all on JB! Therefore, the action drama is too literary, and the literary drama is too cold. three. I agree with the best Bond of Daniel Craig and the aesthetic orientation of handsome guys from the East and the West Craig 007. Many people are depressed and have no cool heads, no high-tech gadgets, and no nakedness. The angels are so ugly with the main ones, and they are about the same at the worst. Why is it the best? I think it's a good summary: there are flesh and blood. The boycott of Craig disappeared with the release of "Casino Royale", and the sound of approval spread rapidly. He is still a gentleman, but he fights more like a warrior. He has a strong posture and does not wear a suit to fight. , And even go through fire and water for the beloved woman. However, voices of disapproval in China can still be seen everywhere. We are too deeply affected by Gao Daquan’s image. We are not tolerant of our shortcomings. The negative effect is a violation of human nature. This is the reality, not to mention that more shortcomings are located in a personable state. For Germany, the most intolerable thing they can do is Bond’s appearance, saying that Bond is ugly and looks like Putin. Of course Craig himself admitted that he is not handsome, but you must know that Daniel Craig has been surveyed by 4,000 women. He was once named the most attractive man in the rankings launched by "Durés", and was named the "Most Well-dressed Man" by "CQ" for two consecutive years. Beckham and Jude Law were left behind by "Empire". Evaluated as the actor of Shinco. This film relies on Daniel's grace to barely maintain its involvement with the previous episode, because this episode and the upper part are not of the same grade, but Bond is still a man of flesh and blood with taste, and he won’t twist his tie, clothing, and food since he was fighting in a suit since his early years. The worry-free playboy, and now a tragic hero who was born to death and even embarrassed to the point of no money, Bond is truly and powerful. Four. About the story: Hatred and Responsibility Bond infiltrated a powerful organization that infiltrated the neighbors in order to revenge the "bride". Of course, it later proved that the organization was not that powerful, but White ran away, so the conspiracy seems to be not over yet. Just the tip of the iceberg. Oga Kurylenko’s appearance in the film made many people disapproving. The lack of sparks between him and Bond seems to go against Bond’s routine. Bond knows that it doesn’t matter if the sparks are sparked, but every time the flames are so strong that the woman can set the woman on fire. , Bond is a person with a strong sense of responsibility and pitying jade. Although he can't control his sexual desire, every time he sees girls scent and burn jade because of him, how can a heart be twisted like a knife. So when Mrs. M said that his charm was in trouble, Bond didn't know whether to cheer or repent, and the original complex mood became more entangled. Revenge is a kind of sensibility. He takes root in his heart and makes him more nostalgic for his old love. This nostalgia also intensifies the hatred. This is the root of Bond's many murderous actions at the beginning; responsibility is a kind of rationality, he To Mrs. M, he constantly emphasized that he was not for hatred, but just due diligence. As soon as he finished speaking, the body of the girl who had had a one-night stand with her was placed in front of him. Revenge and duty, sexy and rationality were struggling in Bond's body. Until the integration, Mrs. M finally let Bond go away is the moving, understanding and compromise of Bond’s tragic feelings. Hate can dazzle reason, but reason can channel the power of hatred. This is Bond's understanding before the final battle and the key to his victory. It is no longer the myth of the undefeated business 007 Bond, but the first time to myth. A reasonable explanation, make it well-founded. Emotional responsibility brings him pain. Although acting on the spot excuses his responsibility, it makes him deeply ashamed. This film is a powerful refutation of acting on the spot. Bond completed his revenge and fulfilled his duties and finally returned to reason, the sentence But your prison is in there, (although the theatre translation is silly) Bond left, not because this Bond is too indifferent, but because he is too gentle. He is no longer the kid who is merciful to women and stunners all night, but treats every point. A new and good man who has fulfilled his promises. His face is scarred because he is a flesh and blood body. He drinks with tears because he has a flesh and blood heart. In both episodes, he hugs and comforts the heroine with his body, once in warm water and once in warm water. In the flames, the two women are precisely his cast of ice and fire. When the friend died, he actually threw the body in the trash can and took the money from him and left a sentence: He wouldn't suggest it! This seemingly cold behavior is indeed what touched me the most about the film. Bond just kept all the heat in his heart, and there was only a slight residual warmth on the surface. If in the previous episode, the new Bond’s temperament was thrown out to make everyone refreshing and enjoyable, then the director of this episode hid Bond under the strong hormones, and every character in the plot was hidden. People feel that the characters are flattened as a matter of course. The dialogue in the first episode is very exciting. The superimposed emotions of the heroes and heroines from the joy of your friends to the adversity make the audience feel empathetic. The dialogue in this episode is quite boring, because there is no witty words and you. Nong and Nong, Bond also ignored humor to alleviate the embarrassing atmosphere. In the last episode Bond was in love, but in this episode Bond is struggling by himself, love can be performed, and the turning of his inner thoughts is not so easy to show. The film came out to comment on the two-level differentiation, because the first instinct I just watched thought this was the worst Bond. First of all, the action scenes of the action film did not pass the test.
View more about Quantum of Solace reviews
