Director: Louis came to Trier
for the commercial laws of the film industry, Ang Lee's tragic "Hulk" was blocked. The reason is simple, that Mr. Banner is too personal and sad, and that Mr. Banner is too civilized and complicated. In fact, it was the failed Mr. Banner that defined the comics career of the superhero Hulk. In any case, the Hulk is the saddest of all superheroes.
Anger generates energy and desires make people lose control. This is the root of human inferiority. Mr. Banner's fate is miserable. The kind person becomes such a wicked person, and the dramatic conflict in it is quite contradictory and helpless. Yes, this is the absolute demeanor of the Hulk, it is definitely not how clear his face can be, how hot and exciting the scene is. However, Ang Lee, who had just arrived in Hollywood, destroyed him because it was not enough for commercial stimulation.
Many years later, "Invincible Hulk" is obviously a model for maintaining film commercialization. It was born to minimize the depth, strengthen the entertainment ingredients, and protect the Hulk brand of Magic Company. As a result, the viewer saw an entertaining film that was as pale as boiling water, which was close to the bottom of the Hollywood superhero series.
Norton's role as Mr. Banner with a miserable fate is theoretically worth looking forward to, but it has been ruined in the concept of the director and the production company. In this popcorn movie that is by no means a refined depth, the heaviness of the character's heart is vaguely visible. But the director's scribbled placement only saw formalized frowning of eyebrows pretending to be painful, and failed to give up the inner struggle and struggle of the character.
It is ridiculous that the director arranged a sensational scene on the mountain top that faked "King Kong", which is enough to testify to the taste of the film. In addition, the chase of the Brazilian slums, with the super funny old and weak figures of Norton and Tim Rose, makes the film even more empty. Norton's acting skills were really ruined in this movie. There is neither power to speak of nor depth to speak of.
It is impossible to imagine that the roles chosen by the director for the film are so abrupt. Liv Tyler's vase is forgivable. Tim Rose can actually play a special elite. Is he old and ambitious? This superficial character has a blunt posture with a gun, shouting slogan-like words in his mouth, turning into an ugly monster without hesitation. Director, you are ruining another outstanding actor. It is better to find a young actor.
What about the action scenes that have been deliberately promoted and strengthened when they are proved to be incapable of being the spiritual leader of the film? The Hulk pays attention to destructive ability, and the keynotes of the two films are all conscientious struggles for this. Therefore, the destructiveness has to be downplayed, especially in this preconceived sequel. By analogy, the action scene is precarious.
The campus chase and the ending downtown decisive battle were suppressed by connotation and scored extraordinarily funny. The former scene is too simplistic. It is necessary to know that the big Hollywood scenes must be crowded and powerful, just like the scenes in Kung Fu movies are false. There is also the sonic cannon. The director obviously thinks that this kind of creativity may bring everyone Ye Luo back to his childhood, but he doesn't know how big the school playground can be. Look at the armored car being divided into two, you know that this is the most uncreative Hollywood special effects.
The ending climax scene is even more funny, the bad giant kicked over piles of cars, the helicopter crashed to the top of the building, and the two angry men punched and kicked, everything was rendered in such a stereotyped technology. Where did the director’s creativity go? that's all? It ended like a street hooligans fight? No matter from a physical point of view, or from a technical point of view, it is unreliable. Does the director think that making the Hulk a little richer is worthy of the audience?
In this way, the original factory chase has become the essence of the film's action scenes. The director exhausted the dark scenes of the horror film in the realistic shots. Among them, the encounter between the Hulk and the Special Elite is quite real, and some ordinary people show objective displays when facing absolute disasters. In short, the action scenes in "Invincible Hulk" are too rough and simple. In fact, this is not a technical problem, but a refinement of missing details.
The biggest feature of the "Hulk" series is actually the helpless struggle of the characters, other than that, there is no distinctive feature. Li Ang's very humanistic depth here makes the weakness of the Hulk, the King of Destruction, more distinct. This stereotype makes the Hulk unable to match the many characteristics of any superhero of its kind. To be honest, the Hulk should be a supporting role, as the protagonist is very unlikely to fascinate sentient beings.
In this regard, the film company is obviously smarter, allowing the successful "Iron Man" to appear at the end of the film. This solved the survival crisis of the Hulk, continued the artistic career of this animated character, and changed the new creative space of superhero movies. It is estimated that the same simple Iron Man and the miserable Hulk still have some expectations in the future. In other words, "Invincible Hulk" is a strategy for commercial films to lose their cars and protect their handsome. It is just a safe transition.
This transition has suffered the public, and some have been deceived.
View more about The Incredible Hulk reviews
