Imagine:
1122 Case-Office of Major Incidents Endangering Public Safety
Digital Evidence-Item No. GA/T 1179-2022
Abstract: The suspect in the "1122" case first announced his motives for committing the crime on the dark web and sent it to the forensic linguistics team for analysis
"China's Cultural Industry and Its Future"
You hold the screen in your hand, you decide to move your finger, decide what to click, what you look at, what you listen to, and what you read are all your own wishes and your own personal choices. Think about what you saw, how did the things you see reached the point where your fingertips are, and think about how many people behind that work for it-some people are responsible for weaving beautiful numbers, exaggerating them to the point where they will Some are responsible for using lancets, silica gel, and botulinum toxin to quickly produce the results that used to take several generations of excellent gene combinations; others are responsible for giving these manufactured products the characteristics of living people, so that the slightest There is no charm, no temperament, no soul, a living product, showing a little humanity, so that we can like them more-as if they also have the emotions we have, so as to gain traffic, gain fans, and achieve better-looking numbers. Because traffic, fans and numbers mean that when we see this face, or this cover, we realize that we have heard others say it, so we should look at it.
……When you swipe your finger across the screen and you are unable to choose, will there be a strange emotion lingering: as if these things have nothing to do with you. Ask yourself, what kind of world do they live in, and why is my world so different? We try to suppress another kind of suspicion: Does this persistent unsatisfactory mean: They cheated us, deceived us, and deprived us of the right to choose? Why can't we always choose what we like? In the work we don’t like, we work diligently, and the money and leisure we exchange for are actually given to them in vain. Because of our credulity, our confusion, we are just like these fake faces, fake data, fake The story deceived.
...I know this scam because I have been in it. This scam, called the cultural industry complex, is a community of interests composed of capital, celebrities, and consumer terminal platform companies. The core purpose of this industrial system is to eliminate our past enjoyable experiences of aesthetics, culture and thinking derived from life, and to replace them with the "simulated cultural experience" produced under the standards of people, channels, and judgments they can control. it. These simulated cultural experiences are the things under your fingertips. It does not require you to like him, identify with it, or admire him. It has only one appeal. You click "Pay." Because when you clicked on the payment, the lies of this scam, all the fake data, fake faces, fake scenes, were confirmed by you to be true. But in real life, the air you open every day, the air you breathe, the streets you walk through, the things you like, hate, sad, and worry, are also insignificant because of your wrong clicks.
……What we see is packaging, promotion, and whitewashing, and the function of packaging is to imply that we do not need to use our brains, do not need to think, do not have our own judgments, believe us, believe what we see. You just need to pay. And I can't help asking, why?
…When I realized the nature of my work as a means of abuse, I not only decided to stop immediately, I decided that I had to repair the damage I had done. The ability of the cultural industry complex to make lies must be destroyed, and one of the ways is to destroy those who are making lies.
...If my actions succeed in achieving my intentions, then I will undoubtedly violate national laws and social morality. If my identity is disclosed, I face arrest, and face legal sanctions, then the cultural industry complex The news media network and its affiliates will describe me as a madman, a neurotic, or a terrorist, of which there is only one title I can accept conditionally. That is, any participant in a political movement before it succeeds is called a "terrorist" by its hostile forces.
……The idea of a conscientious terrorist will inevitably be communicated to the public. Therefore, the integration of cultural interests is more likely to say that I am a lunatic, because the idea I believe in threatens the interests of each of them and shakes In order for them to survive, my actions have created a devastating threat to every beneficiary of the cultural industry complex and everyone who helps them defend the lies. They will destroy my reputation at all costs and build Lies about me. The real me, although unwise, is at least sensible and open-minded, and clearly realizes that as a Chinese, I cannot shirk my own culture and the image and status of my compatriots in the world. Responsibility. Although my behavior is outside the law, I still serve the long-term interests of this ancient ethnic group, rather than selling my soul to an elite group that has a distorted mentality and a cynic thinking, and strives to get rid of national identity and collective image.
??????????????????????????????????????????
As an example above, if a serial killer kills countless stars in the name of spreading the above ideas, experience this feeling. Write these, to lead to my thoughts:
What, who, and why of terrorists
The what and why elements of this play are,
Send bombs / Students who have been violated by Harvard Science Experiments, intelligent and capable mathematicians / Think that freedom is deprived of science and technology, transforming society
The film and television story of "The Bomber Hunter" is written to tell us the elements of these cases through the plot of the detective investigation; the difference from ordinary crimes stems from his motive (WHY). Ordinary investigations, whether it is "L&O", "CSI" or "The Killing", with the change of Who (suspect), we have to consider what is the Why (motivation) of the crime, whether it is monetary benefits, revenge, accidental death, concealment of crimes Facts, wait.
In "Chasing", although WHY comes from the ideological concept, "technology deprives freedom", but its core is still the theme of individual freedom being deprived by society .
Leaders who can find the truth, the truth, and the right path are often rejected in human organizations. Because the purpose of the organization is to maintain the status quo.
On the one hand, this point can more arouse primitive emotions. We have all experienced being marginalized, or our correct opinions are not valued. This kind of frustration is immediately recognized by the audience-on the other hand, it is also a close link between the detective and the criminal. it 's a link:
In order to better understand the character network construction of detective stories, you can watch this video to understand,
1) Criminals and detectives are sensitive and observant people, they have discovered the same things together, and they believe in no doubt
2) In the investigation, there must be a comparison with the partner's personality, so that we can find the detective's deep hidden flaws (the character's ghost, wound, lack)
3) The demands of criminals are also the desires of detectives. Criminals are the "shadows and extreme behaviors" of detectives, and they are the only things that can change the detectives.
Script classroom
In "Chasing", Detective Fitz is a person who is extremely difficult to climb up the promotion ladder. Why? Because he is anti-social and disdain to follow the hierarchical culture in the government. After one road is blocked, he must increase the competitiveness of the other side to improve his domineering side. Fortunately, but also unfortunately, such a self-taught new agent with excellent grades received a "positive feedback", joined the most important project team, looking for Unabomber. The so-called positive feedback means that the society rewards him for his anti-social behavior and allows him to continue to think independently and disobey management. Then the boss Don asked him to obey, obedient, and patiently ask him to do as required, not because he hated the subordinate, but taught him. This is the truth of society. In addition to accomplishing the organizational goals, Fitz must learn another key goal of social organization, to ensure that each person in the hierarchy is respected and given face.
This is absolutely impossible for Ted to do.
The first truth of society: Smart and wise people are the enemy of society.
Don't believe that because of your grades, talents, abilities, IQ, etc., your organization really regards you as an asset. No matter what society it is, there are rules of the game, there is a top-down pyramid hierarchy, and smart people see the goal, smarter people see the ultimate meaning, they don’t care about the rules of the game at all, this is What makes others in the system uncomfortable. Of course, it is more likely that the troublemakers are actually smart narcissists. Their rebellion against the rules of the game directly threatens the stability of the system, because everyone must contribute to this system so that the system can achieve its goals. The price of cooperation is compromise. , There are more compromises, these compromises remove the human touch of communication between people behind, and abstract into a terrible, cold rule. When science and technology help to implement this rule, it’s like you call a customer service, a robot When you are asked to "press 1", you are marginalized. Therefore, our bomber Unabomber is not so much talking about how freedom is deprived of technology, as it is complaining about the collective collusion of society to kill individuality and kill independent thinking.
A person who has received higher education and lacks socialization must be the one who lives the most awkward and wants to be heard most. The non-violent method is like Chris in "Into the Wild" is self-sufficient in Alaska, resists civilized society, and suffers in the end. The other is that Ted is so aggressive, living on the edge of civilization, quietly laying out, and attacking society. Both of these approaches must be exposed to the natural environment to draw spiritual power. The reason is not how beautiful nature is, how sober-minded, and brave, but because nature is not human civilization.
The second truth of society: whether there are animals or plants, the system in which people in society live is the "natural" environment.
Nature is given to mankind by the earth. It is very beautiful, full of intrinsic and practical value. When Ted complains that technology destroys human freedom and controls our ability to choose, and also complains that the current society destroys nature by embracing technology, this concept is actually sought after by many environmentalists. But can nature only be given to mankind by the earth? If you are a social person, you have to accept that the woods and the sea are just places you go on statutory holidays and rest days, and your nature is the system created by human civilization. It is the subway, office, and waiting area where you are. Lobby, 220v AC, 5G mobile phone network, 802.11 wifi.
Intellectuals represented by Ted, including many environmentalists, are highly educated, and they tend to treat the collective human beings as a mob. The collective civilization of humanity naturally requires total denial and criticism. In their view, since it was created by humans, there must be a problem. Otherwise, why my correct point of view cannot be integrated into the creation of the current human society. The Ted’s only argument is that “this is not nature.” But nature does not represent a collective choice of mankind. Only the ethnic groups in the Arctic Circle, Amazon, Sub-Sahara, Solomon Group and other places do not want to use technology to transform their living environment. Most humans choose to pass Give up a certain kind of freedom, exchange for some convenient functions, and queue up like a flock of sheep to buy.
The actual situation is very likely that we humans will destroy the earth, or transform the earth into an unrecognizable appearance. These, as a social person, we all have to treat these "humanistic" environments as "people". This is why Teds despise most people.
The third truth of society: no one has the answer, but we all know what we should do.
The FBI investigation of the bombing in the film went astray at the beginning, and I can only blame my own organizational system for not having a mechanism to stimulate innovative ideas and no channels for smart people to make contributions. But when the organization faces a crisis and needs to change under pressure, who does the organization trust to face the challenges of the unknown world?
All the fields involved in human experience can be summarized as: the known world, the unknown world, and the seeker. In the normal operation of society, this stable, safe, and very authoritative known world is at play; when a crisis occurs, society’s goal of maintaining the status quo will hinder its ability to face the challenges of the unknown world. In any case, the person appointed by the organization must be an obedient person trained by the organization, the so-called trained personnel. They already understand what the leadership wants, what the organization wants, and what these goals and the case want are not always consistent. Don't expect any big leader to win on your behalf. No one knows what the truth is, only relying on past experience, or relying on their own unsuspecting stories. Therefore, this society is facing collapse at any time, and there will never be enough smart people, not enough leadership, not enough emergency plans. So what is it to keep this society running stably?
you. You know what is right and what is recognized by society. Your obedience, your compromise, in the group, you never do extreme things. You are a resident of the known world. When you face the unknown world, your education, intelligence, execution, and social resources determine whether you approve of what society teaches you, whether you approve of society, and whether you can prove your beliefs with behavior.
Going back to the first truth, it is very possible that when facing the unknown world, society will treat you as an enemy.
If i'm a pervert
Back to my hypothesis: I feel that Chinese culture is threatened by the "cultural industry complex", and I have created terrorist activities, which are reported worldwide. I issued "China's Cultural Industry and Its Future" and it was spread. I did not get the sympathy and approval of ordinary people because of the correct beliefs and convincing arguments, but it was precisely because I made extremes. Behavior . And I successfully put it into action. You may judge whether I am morally or legally right or wrong. And it is obvious that any use of violence is a challenge to this country and will inevitably be punished.
But you can’t calculate and measure, a random person’s attitude towards me. For example, in this industry, you may want to change the status quo, may be dissatisfied with the current situation, whether this random person recognizes my declaration, whether it is good or bad for him, has nothing to do with whether he believes what I said.
WHO is the unabomer? "Hunting the Bomberman" is the most delicate and humane depiction of terrorists among all detective films, but we know that Ted is tragic. This kind of tragedy does not come from the end he gets the punishment he deserves, but from his desire for love, his betrayal, and his yearning for communication with ordinary people. This savvy businessman, who might have had a good life, chose to confront science, technology and humanities-and society life and death.
View more about Manhunt reviews
