When Farrell confessed to the priest, he said that he killed people for money. But after the end of the whole movie, none of the three killers who died was for money. Can you explain that this was a misunderstanding, or an unreal conjecture. My explanation is that this is a gift from the director. Even if it is a tragedy, it is because they stick to their beliefs. Utopian beliefs are what we lack.
Yesterday I had a meal with the comrades in Taili this semester. The scene was still very shocking. A lot of things that should not be said and cannot be said and are not suitable to be said all came out when I was semi-conscious, those pretending words Without going through the brain, I remember I told Hana and Wu Di that there was a line in the V-letter Vendetta team: Every grain of rain has God in it, let us worship God. At that time, it was raining heavily outside Lao He Ji's window. Those recordings were not gorgeous dividing lines. What was piled on tables and chairs that needed to be understood was not pain, but was just a broken back.
The film is selected in the small town of Bruges in Belgium. This world filtered by the lens has become extremely pure. The architecture of the Middle Ages and the smiles scattered everywhere can almost make people forget that the conflict written by the screenwriter is to be staged here. , The protagonists are all killers, but when you see the bald gangsters robbing here are holding revolvers with empty bullets, probably this is the least realistic town, but with English humorous dialogue. When flooding the entire movie, maybe it might end up being a Happy Ending. So when Ken sent Thunder on the train, when Harry shot Ken in the thigh with a gun, I naively thought that maybe the misunderstanding would end like this, maybe the three killers would help each other in the bar next to the canal like the heroes of the West. Drank in here, but the director didn’t warm us up on Christmas Eve.
In the end, the cruel fight in reality was staged, but it brought us the most lacking principle in reality. It is a pity that such persistence is stained with the blood of a real man. Harry said to his wife that face-saving matters are the most serious things. , The face here is not vanity, but principle. He can't tolerate the killer killing the child while performing the task. Even when he finally realized that it might be a mistake, he still chose to persist. Is this stubborn? For many facts, the final result is irretrievable, although Ken can say when persuading Lei that you can save more children. But under the wrong casting, this is already the case. They looked at the painting on Judgment Day, and although they had different expressions, they thought the same thing. He is willing to use religion to support himself, Harry uses his own moral principles to maintain himself, while Lei moves forward in confusion. What is sad is not about to die, but not being able to apologize. In "V for Vendetta", the female doctor who used V for human experimentation told V before she died, is it too late to apologize? V said, Never. When
Westerns were popular before, people would talk about the dialogue in it because people lacked justice. Later, the decline of Westerns was not only because the model was broken, but also because most people had given up. The heroes they were trying to find in the movie didn't exist, and those morals and justice were all killed and wounded in the intrigue. Victory often has no results, the struggle has already begun, the heroes are gone, and the anarchist idols have been established one by one.
How to measure the required spirit, youth died in 1968, ideal died in 1989, morality? How terrible the outside world is. Voss in "Painful Fang" sat slumped in the cube as soon as the exit opened. He didn't want to go out. He was afraid that we don’t have to use the capitalist exploitation of the online guide to describe this era. Everyone has used the most appropriate vocabulary, but the intangibles are declining. This is the world of adults. Lennon also said that rock cannot be saved. In this world, he is dead. As for those who did not die, as Ma Shifang in "Blue Underground Homesickness" described, the leaders of the student movement have compromised and entered the system.
Therefore, when Liu Zhitai told Cui Minzhi in "Old Boy", "The outside is just a bigger prison", no one is spared. You can explain what you can and cannot control your own destiny. But slowly, people will become numb, just like the Indian people still support their Bollywood music and dance movies as always. No matter how mentally retarded the story is, at least you don’t need to use your brains. Life is not good. Why do you have to spend money to go to the theater? What about the suffering of the reality? This is a common problem of human beings, and the truth is that thinking is indeed not necessarily meaningful. It seems that more often thinking is mediocre. Isn’t Socrates dead? Isn’t Archimedes dead? Isn’t Wang Shiwei dead, okay? ,so be it. Kevin Costner had a wonderful and sensational indictment at the end of "Assassination of Kennedy". As a result, the jury agreed that the defendant was not guilty. So...Fuck it.
On Christmas Eve, the gun went off, and the dying thunder was on the stretcher, muttering: There is a Christmas tree somewhere in London...
No one has to die, but it's not that they have done nothing wrong. thing. The heroes are dead, we watch the excitement, occasionally talk nonsense, sometimes innocence is what it deserves, there are many gift boxes under that Christmas tree, open them, you will get what you deserve, but you should find it first That tree.
View more about In Bruges reviews
