Looking at the name, I thought it was a story that reflected the American fashion and social issues in the mid-90s through the character's growth experience. After watching it, I found out that this is a typical negative education film. The original family of the little boy in the film is deformed and unfortunate: there is no father who teaches the boy how to be a man, and his mother is a poor man in the flesh business. The brother did not play the role of a big brother, and he never understood what he knew. Music and street culture were taught to the younger brother who tried to get close to him in the first place. Because of his old age, he often punched and kicked his younger brother. In the real street conflict, there was no ganster's "don't counsel, just do it." This made the little boy who witnessed the incident a deep disappointment. On the contrary, the young black skateboarder played the role of a sensible big brother in the little boy's life.
View more about Mid90s reviews
