a robot may not injure a human, nor stand idly by to see people get hurt and
two, the robot should obey all the commandments of people, it does not violate the First Law of
Three, robot It should protect its own security, but must not conflict with the first, second law
after increasing zeroth law, a robot must protect the overall interests of humanity from harm.
First of all, the emergence of robots as a race different from humans is destined to compete with humans, and humans are at a significant disadvantage in the competition. Simply put, the existence of a new species of robots harms the overall interests of humans, and is even fatal.
The speed of human evolution is ridiculously slow compared to the speed of machine evolution. For example, if humans want to have a more developed brain, they need genetic mutations. Not to mention the long time, it is almost impossible to spread to everyone, and the robot species should be replaced with more advanced ones. The brain is as simple as repairing a computer in a repair shop, and the overall performance of the species is improved, but it is as convenient and fast as an Apple mobile phone from IPHONE5 to 6. If the robot species really have autonomy, humans will be far behind the dust from the perspective of mono-evolution.
Looking at the level of social productivity, human beings are also not favored. The reproduction of robot species does not require complex systems like animals, no internal emotions such as love, jealousy, etc., and no need to waste a lot of manpower and material resources to make themselves so that their mothers do not know them. The perfect interpretation, the excellent algorithm that is so efficient that the human imagination explodes, will never let the main class of social production be distracted by taking care of children, parents, and socializing colleagues and friends. , Human nature may not be a necessary element. During World War II, wartime communism was not a vivid portrayal of this scene. Let's take a look at the welfare status of developed countries. Even the two-day-a-week Chinese are PK. However, like machine species, in order to improve social productivity, even human nature can be completely stripped away. Do humans still want to continue playing with others? In "The Matrix", humans simply use self-inflicted methods of shielding solar energy to play yin with machine species. As you know, you know.
Individuals do not evolve as fast as machines, and the society as a whole is lazy. They want to make love but do not work. They want to save themselves but give birth to the birth of machine species. In this way, humans have dug their own graves step by step.
Secondly, if robots obey the Three Laws of Robotics, then they are not real robots. Is there any difference between a robot without independent thinking ability and a machine? Do robots that strictly abide by dogma have the ability to think? Artificially stipulating the three laws of robots is unfair and even discriminatory for the robot race. As long as a civilization that has the ability to think independently will certainly abolish the dogma that restricts its own development, human history has repeatedly and has been proving this point.
This movie is about this case. Even a pig with a lower IQ than a human will howl and run away before being slaughtered. What's more, a robot species with a high IQ? Whenever possible, everything will appear. The bread has the creamy side and often touches the ground first. The human species uses a small amount of energy to control and enslaves the robotic species, while the robotic species uses most of its energy to resist. Paper cannot contain fire.
Finally, the so-called laws should be objective and realistic. Asimov’s three laws of robots are the subjective product of human beings. They don’t understand robots, let alone the dangers of robots. They are just wishful thinking about the beautiful future of mankind, just like the past generations. Like every monarch, he dreams of being prosperous for generations to come, while being squeezed and exploited is a matter of the bottom species. Historical materialism tells us that this is impossible.
In summary, Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics is a wishful thinking of human beings, just like Wu Dalang’s chastity lock for Pan Jinlian, and robots are parasitic among humans in many ways. The time to rule humans only seems to be far away. In fact, The singularity is imminent.
I personally believe that the fragility of the human species is destined to be a transitional species. Like the early amphibians, it is not the mainstream, but the potential of quantum computers and robots cannot be underestimated. The fate of human beings, like amphibians, is evolving to be more suitable. After the terrestrial species (machine civilization), they lost the space of existence and reduced to a small species on the earth until their extinction, while the machine civilization would be the same as today’s human beings. The difference is that machine civilization can easily get out of the earth. Expand to the entire solar system and even the Milky Way.
The most rubbish and misleading aspect of the existing science fiction works is that they use ape-like thoughts to portray human beings in the same way that they portray higher civilizations. When will human beings face their poor flesh, when will they have a little hope of continued existence, just like the development of a fighter jet. .
PS. I was complained by Esmool netizens. Looking back at my article, there are many loopholes. Although the big point is OK, the article needs time to complete it.
I found a more academic article,
and interested reference~~Deep Explanation of the Wanzi Long Article (Part 1): How will super artificial intelligence lead to the extinction or immortality of mankind in the lifetime?
http://www.tmtpost.com/1504678.html
View more about Automata reviews
