For this work, I am not familiar with its literary script, and I have never read its predecessor. But this time, the director disappointed me.
Why use the personal likes and dislikes of the chocolate magician as the criterion for judging "good kids"? Greedy; chewing gum, proud; headstrong and domineering; love to watch TV and have no imagination-they are all children, and they have the most common shortcomings. What power does a magician have to impose terrible punishments on them like witchcraft?
What is an "unobtrusive child"? It's nothing more than a child who fits the adults' minds as "behaved, sensible, and obedient". Is Charlie the perfect "good kid"? Then I can also say: He picked up the money for the chocolate, and he was dishonest.
Under the so-called ideological and moral wands, everything can be demonized, including twisting the innocent hearts of children. In fact, what this little child will grow into depends largely on the kind of adults around them.
Let kids be kids! And, give them the opportunity to make mistakes and correct them.
Everyone should have their own "chocolate factory", which is a place full of imagination and hope. Everyone should have their own "chocolate factory", and then slowly taste how much delicious and sweet...
View more about Charlie and the Chocolate Factory reviews
