One of the warming materials for Hollywood molesting the masses is to find the neglected elite among the masses. In 2012, moneyball (penalties become gold) strongly shaped the professional baseball manager (played by Brad Pitt) and won an Oscar nomination & a double box office harvest, the directors have extended their feet to the fragile football fans and strived to build the NFL career The heroic image of the manager turning the tide.
Xiaoyu Xiaoxia's analysis of Hollywood's bad street brand, "hero", made a three-pointer, and lz did not add fuel to the fire and sparked a new round of complaints.
Here, let’s look at the clues of the play in a very simple way: middle-aged man ---- picks up a phone call ---- will be fooled by suspicion ---- interspersed with laughter and scold Xiaojiabiyu ---- see through Huyou at the last moment--- -Conversely, the Dao is one foot high and the magic is one foot high to implement the anti-flicker-everyone has called it awesome. Secondly, I must affirm that Draft-Day has appropriately popularized the functions of the football team's operation and management team, the composition of the staff, the responsibilities of managers and coaches, and the necessity of office romance in the football management team. Regarding the unfolding of the plot, the director has shaped the male lead from two aspects: on the one hand, as the professional manager of the Cleveland team who has just taken over his father’s deceased, his experience and ability have been questioned. Therefore, he must make achievements in his career and establish prestige to convince the public. There are designs from competitors to disperse the fog and find the truth; on the other hand, as an ordinary person, the divorced male protagonist hesitates to disclose his love affair with the pregnant secretary female protagonist, causing entanglements between love and career. While accepting the shock of his father's death, his rugby family background also had a mixed relationship with his career (for example, accepting the suspicions of the rich second generation). After experiencing these ups and downs, the male protagonist found a solution to the career problem (rejecting the spoiler keywords), so as to easily solve other entanglements, like the correct interpretation of the philosophy of life formula.
In the end, if I don’t tell the story of the small fish and shrimp, I might be classified as having a low IQ, which will be ignored by the video and technical manual workers. My two cents:
1 The movie is based on "deception, "Flicking the opponent" was developed as the material. Although there are some successful and warm performances in the junior third, it is not enough to make up for the suspicion of promoting negative themes in Hollywood's broad values;
2 The director's addition of the only laugh field element turned out to make the audience laugh at a very nerd. The secretary's male assistant, as a nerd, I barely found a shelter in the darkness of the theater. It showed me that Hollywood once again showed its lower limit.
3 The anti-flicker of the male protagonist in the movie is the key to solving the problem. The starting point is Data mining a star rookie quarterback’s life taint to find the possibility of being fooled, but because of a non-existent bar trouble ticket to determine that the rookie lied, and then came to the conclusion that this is a flicker plan is really far-fetched, so many friends have a momentary view. The movie experience is "Ah 2~~~~~".
Yes/no answers to common questions (lazy people do not explain):
1 Do you need rugby common sense to watch this play----Yes
2 Does the play contain scenes that are not suitable for children----No
3 Can this film shape a professional football manager The positive image of ——No
4 Whether the film can enter the Oscar——No technically
View more about Draft Day reviews