Breaking through the network firewall and stealing bank deposits does not mean much. Because the technical content is too high, ordinary viewers will not have much sense of identity in the face of these professional terms and professional skills, even if the protagonist has already flown into the homes of ordinary people. The use of fax machines and iPods to assemble the theft tools will not add to the appreciation of the theft process. This kind of technology has too many limitations, one is not practical, and second, there is no sense of satisfaction in the operation process.
The wit battle between Ford and the villain for several rounds also ended because of the villain’s mental retardation (which villain would even take the hostage’s dog when holding a hostage family?), wit fighting should have been the focus of this type of film, high-tech information technology The introduction of "Enemy of the People" and "Minority Report" can make full use of high technology, increase the imagination of the wit battle process, and make the wit battle process not inferior to the speeding chase. The game of wits in this film can only be said to be very general. High-tech has little effect on the viewing of the match between the two sides, and there is nothing to make people shine in the battles of several rounds. The film wants to return to the traditional action film, and the ending is eager to end (the problem of the Hong Kong film), and Ford enters the enemy camp alone, sweeping the crime with his bare hands. Remember, you are not Huang Rong and do not know martial arts. The highlight of this kind of action scene is only to analyze which shots used the avatar and how to block the avatar's face. Don't say surprises, you won't even be surprised.
The plot is so weak, I naturally want to see something unexpected, such as a clever line, such as an interesting character, if the villain can make the audience gritted teeth, it would be a small accomplishment.
Bill controlled the family of Jack (played by Harrison Ford) from the beginning. Jack played tricks. As a result, Bill was killed by Bill who was in charge of monitoring Jack’s men. This shows that Bill is a very cruel person, but he only treats himself. It’s hard to understand that Jack has at least three hostages, one wife, one son, one daughter, and one dog. It’s not too much to kill one. At first, Bill threatened Jack with the lives of his family, but did not kill him. Later, Jack used the money from the account to ask Bill to release the hostages. When Bill was frustrated, he could only curse. He probably forgot his identity. He had killed him before. Many people are definitely not good men and women, but why are they so tolerant of this auspicious family? If it were me, I would kill one of the family members when Jack first started playing tricks, and let Jack choose which one to kill (it can also create family conflicts). Later, when Jack was bargaining, he would kill another one, and then when Jack appeared, he would kill another one in person. In that case, no matter how bad the movie is, it will at least leave me with the image of a badass.
Letting the protagonist Xianjia shovel or almost Nianjia shovel is my hope for ordinary films, so that even without Huang Qiusheng, it can basically rise to the height of anti-socialism (Huang Zeng said that Qiu Litao can only rise to the anti-social level with him. The height of society). Obviously, I was not satisfied.
View more about Firewall reviews
