You can only rely on God

I watched a set of American TV programs a long time ago. I can’t remember what it is called "X". The form of the program is roughly spoof + reality show + candid shooting. Each episode invites a large number of live audiences to compare X with the host. Gesture, so I remembered an X. The main point of the real program is to broadcast the love of the host pretending to be a variety of people to make people and then secretly take pictures. For example, sometimes the host will act as a blind date to go on a blind date with the girls, and then the situation will be various, or Too rude, or too nervous, and then the various natural reflections made by the girls were secretly photographed, and then they were broadcast on the show. People who were secretly photographed would also be invited to the scene to scream and laugh with the audience. , Applause...

Americans seem to be quite good at this.

So in my opinion, "Borat" is an upgrade of "X", but this time the narrative of the cause and effect is more complete, the storyline is more continuous, the material is put more, the play is more vigorous, but the soup does not change the medicine. I always think this Porat is the host of "X" back then. That buddy often turns into a variety of images to meet people, and the foreigners all look the same, so... um.

"Porat" is also known as: "Porat: The American Learning Journey of Kazakhs", "Porat-Learning American Culture in order to build a great motherland, Kazakhstan", etc., you can see from the name Out, this film is taking the edge route, and it is rushing to win the prize.

The film is indeed very marginal, and the people who were secretly filmed were all marginal figures or groups: Jews, feminist organizations, blacks, homosexuals, gypsies, extremists, prostitutes...

But the film actually has no position at all, and neither stand on it. On the strong side, it is completely neutral and does not fall in favor of disadvantaged groups. Therefore, after the film is released, there will be disadvantaged groups to criticize opposition, and the strong side will laugh or pursue it. This is completely reasonable: the weaker group needs attention, and the strong side must always show tolerance, regardless of the facts. Really tolerant.

All contradictions and conflicts probably come from not understanding. Not understanding can rely on language barriers, cultural differences, and even on God: Why did you destroy the Tower of Babel and disrupt the language of mankind in the first place? But God is also afraid, if humans work together to build the Tower of Babel, God will be pulled off the altar. Therefore, tolerance is not the nature of human beings or even gods. Misunderstandings may be more important than the misunderstanding. Therefore, Porat’s situation in the United States is not a reflection of Kazakhstan’s backwardness and ignorance. Americans do not need to be complacent. People who go to Kazakhstan to study will still be in various situations, because they don’t understand and don’t want to really understand.

Therefore, Porat did not learn about the United States through learning. He did not care about learning. He went his own way in the United States and acted in his own way. So what he brought back to the country was only the iPod and the mini iPod and hated the Jewish change. Cheng hates Christianity, these are only superficial things, and there is no change in essence. A deep-rooted thing makes everyone rush to talk, but they don’t want to listen to what others are saying. This thing probably fell in the Tower of Babel. God gave it to mankind when it came down.

The award of "Borat" probably found an outlet for all parties, whether it is a weak condemnation or a strong tolerance. After that, what should everyone do, or don't think about the world as the world. Bar.

View more about Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan reviews