1. Movie The Turkic nationalism standard is too strong: the descriptions of both sides are not objective, and many of the soldiers in Sudan are slaves. In the movies, they are described as dead soldiers who are hated by the country and the family. . When Constantine appeared, he had a treacherous and cunning face of 213. . No wonder the Greeks and Turkey were scolded as soon as the movie came out. .
2. Character portraying with facial makeup: Sultan Mohammed was born with auspiciousness from the heavens, and the turkey country played with the rest of the heavens? A dignified emperor, he usually likes to clenched his fists and talks to himself with big words and monologues, or all kinds of nightmares, walking mazes, and dreams of his fathers and ancestors. . . Maybe this kind of film has been watched a lot since I was young. Every time I see a look of mighty, solemn, justice, solemnity and inviolability, I feel very funny. . . .
3. The main line introduces jumping, and the character depiction is vague: The whole main line is developed around the fall of Constantinople in 1453, but there are no causes and consequences, marching routes, and battle sequences at all, that's fine. . In the end, it took so much effort to portray Hassan and the Genoese muscular man against A. Is this playing Assassin's Creed?,, the fall of such a big city has a relationship with two Rambo against A.
4. The war scene is severely distorted: the real 8w people siege war, not that 8w people rushed up end to end. The scenes of the movie deliberately emphasize the grandeur, but it looks so fake. It really costs so much money to make an animation. In all fairness, they are inferior to the celestial dynasty. . .
Summary: It’s a bit of a little yy film, basically I took it myself and watched myself enjoy it.
View more about Conquest 1453 reviews
